The translated rpcauth string is no longer valid after I merged c2ea1e6561caba3abffce361abc800822b9e0efe, so why not simplify it for translators?
I think splitting out untranslatable words helps translators.
The rendered text has no diff.
doc: Parameterize rpcauth help text for translation #9473
pull MarcoFalke wants to merge 1 commits into bitcoin:master from MarcoFalke:Mf1701-transPara changing 3 files +57 −31-
MarcoFalke commented at 4:24 PM on January 4, 2017: member
-
doc: Parameterize rpcauth help text for translation fa7d6804c5
- MarcoFalke added the label Docs and Output on Jan 4, 2017
- MarcoFalke added the label Priority Low on Jan 4, 2017
-
luke-jr commented at 7:24 PM on January 4, 2017: member
I think too much splitting can make translation harder. Perhaps some diverse translators can comment?
-
laanwj commented at 9:30 AM on January 5, 2017: member
Yes, splitting makes translation harder. Fragments are harder to translate, and the result may not be sensible especially in right-to-left languages (though that's not as much of a problem when splitting per sentence I guess...).
- MarcoFalke closed this on Jan 5, 2017
- MarcoFalke deleted the branch on Jan 5, 2017
-
MarcoFalke commented at 12:59 PM on January 5, 2017: member
The rational was that stuff like
_("This option can be specified multiple times")is used for several options, thus can be split.But meh, not worth to bike shed about. Let's keep it in mind for future changes.
- MarcoFalke locked this on Sep 8, 2021
Contributors
Labels