Inconsistency with the standard bip-0044 real work bitcoind #9917

1. Software should prevent the creation of an account if a previous account does not have a transaction history (meaning none of its addresses have been used before).

But I can easily create an account even if the previous account is empty.

2. Address gap limit.

I can also see that the amount has reached the account, in which there are many more consecutive addresses without a transaction history, even if the amount is sent to the address after those addresses without a transaction.

Addresses created by the command: bitcoin-cli getnewaddress <account>

But I can easily create an account even if the previous account is empty.

The account system in bitcoind is kind of crappy. Do not confuse it with BIP44 accounts, it pre-dates any of that. This is why it is deprecated, and will be removed in the future. See #3816.

I don't understand your address gap comment.

Bitcoin Core does not implement BIP44 in any way.

When will the account feature be removed then?

When will the account feature be removed then?

First a label API should be introduced to replace it. Hopefully that can be done for 0.15. Then something like: in 0.16 it could be disabled by default (but reenabled with an option) and in 0.17 removed completely. But it's not entirely decided yet. In any case: do not use it, it's broken.

Closing this issue, as indeed BIP44 is not applicable at all here.