See the discussion starting here: #936 (comment)
build: Rename arm to arm32 and check if it's really supported #1034
issue real-or-random opened this issue on December 7, 2021-
real-or-random commented at 10:16 AM on December 7, 2021: contributor
-
Psycho-Pirate commented at 7:01 PM on February 17, 2022: none
I would like to work on this. Please tell me which files need to be updated.
-
real-or-random commented at 8:57 PM on February 17, 2022: contributor
Have a look at configure.ac. You need to be familiar with shell scripting, and you need to figure out a way to detect arm32 support. The autoconf documentation may be useful. (https://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/)
-
Psycho-Pirate commented at 9:51 AM on February 18, 2022: none
Thanks, I will look into this!
-
real-or-random commented at 10:23 AM on August 2, 2022: contributor
@Psycho-Pirate Are you still interested in working on this?
- real-or-random cross-referenced this on Mar 8, 2023 from issue build: Add CMake-based build system by hebasto
- real-or-random cross-referenced this on Mar 8, 2023 from issue build: Meta-issue for follow-ups to initial CMake merge (#1113) by real-or-random
- real-or-random cross-referenced this on Mar 10, 2023 from issue build: Meta-issue for follow-ups to initial CMake merge (#1113) by hebasto
- hebasto cross-referenced this on May 11, 2023 from issue build: Rename arm to arm32 and check if it's really supported by hebasto
-
hebasto commented at 11:17 AM on May 11, 2023: member
At least in CMake-based build system, it seems worth making the
SECP256K1_ASMoption actually dependent on the value of theCMAKE_SYSTEM_PROCESSORvariable. ThenON/OFFvalues will be enough for it with defaults as follows:ONforx86_64OFFforarm
- real-or-random closed this on May 12, 2023
Contributors
Linked (view graph)