This PR:
Consolidates all CI jobs.
Frees up resources allocated to Cirrus permanent workers.
ci: Convert `arm64` Cirrus tasks to GHA jobs #1689
pull hebasto wants to merge 5 commits into bitcoin-core:master from hebasto:250619-ci-arm64 changing 2 files +63 −140-
hebasto commented at 7:56 PM on June 19, 2025: member
-
ci: Rename Docker image tag to reflect architecture b77aae9226
-
ci: Add `arm64` architecture to `docker_cache` job bcf77346b9
-
ci: Switch `arm64_debian` from QEMU to native `arm64` Docker image e814b79a8b
-
ci: Move `gcc-snapshot` build for `arm64` from Cirrus to GHA 5fafdfc30f
-
ci: Move Valgrind build for `arm64` from Cirrus to GHA 004f57fcd8
- real-or-random added the label ci on Jun 20, 2025
- real-or-random approved
-
real-or-random commented at 9:26 AM on June 24, 2025: contributor
ACK 004f57fcd86de3ea8cb0e6a16f5bb665db9d1ed4
- real-or-random added the label refactor/smell on Jun 24, 2025
-
real-or-random commented at 9:34 AM on June 24, 2025: contributor
Hm, this adds another ~1.6 GB to the cache, which has a 10 GB limit. I think it's fine, but we need to check if we run into cache trashing, e.g., if we have PRs changing the Dockerfile. @hebasto What do you think?
-
hebasto commented at 10:34 AM on June 24, 2025: member
Hm, this adds another ~1.6 GB to the cache, which has a 10 GB limit. I think it's fine, but we need to check if we run into cache trashing, e.g., if we have PRs changing the Dockerfile. @hebasto What do you think?
I've considered this implication while working on this PR. Given that PRs changing the Dockerfile are rare, I do believe this is acceptable.
- jonasnick approved
-
- jonasnick merged this on Jul 8, 2025
- jonasnick closed this on Jul 8, 2025
Contributors
Labels