This makes it more clear that a null check is intended. Avoiding the use of a pointer as a test condition alse increases the type-safety of the comparisons.
(This is also MISRA C 2012 rules 14.4 and 11.9)
This makes it more clear that a null check is intended. Avoiding the use of a pointer as a test condition alse increases the type-safety of the comparisons.
(This is also MISRA C 2012 rules 14.4 and 11.9)
This makes it more clear that a null check is intended. Avoiding the
use of a pointer as a test condition alse increases the type-safety
of the comparisons.
(This is also MISRA C 2012 rules 14.4 and 11.9)
FWIW, resulting shared library is bit identical for me.
utACK