This pull request fixes a bug which allows the sh variable to be used uninitialised
when sscanf(3) returns EOF.
Signed-off-by: Mustapha Abiola mustapha@trilemma.net
secp256k1/src/tests.c: Properly handle sscanf(3) return value #650
pull ghost wants to merge 1 commits into bitcoin-core:master from changing 1 files +1 −1-
ghost commented at 3:08 PM on July 14, 2019: none
-
a11c76c59a
secp256k1/src/tests.c: Properly handle sscanf return value
This pull request fixes a bug which allows the `sh` variable to be used uninitialized when sscanf returns EOF. Signed-off-by: Mustapha Abiola <mustapha@trilemma.net>
-
sipa commented at 4:49 PM on July 14, 2019: contributor
ACK a11c76c59a431e3492994f71a968a838e398fb58.
- real-or-random approved
-
real-or-random commented at 7:58 AM on July 15, 2019: contributor
ACK a11c76c59a431e3492994f71a968a838e398fb58 I looked at the code
-
practicalswift commented at 9:33 AM on July 31, 2019: contributor
utACK a11c76c59a431e3492994f71a968a838e398fb58
- jonasnick referenced this in commit e028aa33d3 on Aug 18, 2019
- jonasnick merged this on Aug 18, 2019
- jonasnick closed this on Aug 18, 2019
- unknown deleted the branch on Aug 20, 2019
- unknown renamed this:
secp256k1/src/tests.c: Properly handle sscanf return value
secp256k1/src/tests.c: Properly handle sscanf(3) return value
on Aug 20, 2019 - sipa cross-referenced this on Jun 9, 2020 from issue Update libsecp256k1 subtree by sipa
- fanquake referenced this in commit 8c97780db8 on Jun 13, 2020
- sidhujag referenced this in commit 8a3a072968 on Jun 13, 2020
- ComputerCraftr referenced this in commit b98f1c6e6c on Jun 16, 2020
- UdjinM6 referenced this in commit 9d36ba6570 on Aug 10, 2021
- 5tefan referenced this in commit 8ded2caa74 on Aug 12, 2021
- gades referenced this in commit d855cc511d on May 8, 2022
Contributors