My opinion has not changed since my last review - it's a clear step up from BIP2 and it's ready for adoption.

The BIP is significantly polished, and enough time has passed for objections to be voiced. Activation has my full support.

Cheers,

Ruben

On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 2:21 AM Murch <murch@murch.one> wrote:

Thanks Jonas, Chris, and Coperbyte Solutions for weighing in.

I rebased the Activation PR today so that it applies the process changes
also to the recently published BIP 433. The Activation PR is now again
(from a technical point of view) ready for merge.

Best,
Murch

On 2026-01-12 04:35, Jonas Nick wrote:
> No objections have been raised since Nov 29, and all objections were
> responded
> to on the mailing list on Dec 2 and addressed in the BIP on Dec 16. The
> latest
> version of the activation PR [0] has received multiple ACKs.
>
> Therefore, I see rough consensus and BIP 3 should activate. The current
> uncertainty is adding friction to the BIP process.
>
> [0] https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1820

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bitcoindev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/a71add89-53ff-4486-9ed9-7cbd1db8ab58%40murch.one.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bitcoindev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/CAPv7TjZjhG4UiG6U1-ktSAFYjwQ4zwyCAws5QqCzz1%3DtGujN1w%40mail.gmail.com.