* [bitcoindev] Proposal for minimum viable PQC protection without a fork
@ 2026-04-11 0:52 Daniel Buchner
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Daniel Buchner @ 2026-04-11 0:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bitcoindev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 906 bytes --]
Just wanted to throw out this proposal for enabling folks to optionally
incorporate PQC protection that doesn't require upfront implementation of
PQC logic/validation code:
https://github.com/csuwildcat/pqc-precommitment-migration. I think it could
be a reasonable middle ground between the (reasonable) hesitance to
integrate PQC code into Bitcoin today vs the desire of some to have a clear
mitigation plan in the unlikely event a Q-Day occurred in the near or
mid-term.
Let me know what you think!
- Daniel
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bitcoindev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/CAHZ6zJH85YLcjtK1yz%2Beq7cnJi7JD5HLVeWp%2Bj1faofwUdQ1Zw%40mail.gmail.com.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1376 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2026-04-11 1:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-04-11 0:52 [bitcoindev] Proposal for minimum viable PQC protection without a fork Daniel Buchner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox