Bitcoin Development Mailinglist
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Falbesoner <sebastian.falbesoner@gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Development Mailing List <bitcoindev@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [bitcoindev] BIP-352: Limiting the number of per-group recipients (K_max)
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2026 09:20:23 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b8edb433-c7b8-4d79-b710-e89a578eb42cn@googlegroups.com> (raw)


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2160 bytes --]

Hi list, 

In the course of working on a Silent Payments module for libsecp256k1 [1], 
we 
discovered that the scanning approach suggested in BIP-352 [2] suffers from 
very poor performance for adversarial transactions [3]. 

One more recent proposal to mitigate this issue is by introducing a "K_max" 
protocol limit. This effectively limits the number of per-group recipients 
within a single transaction, i.e. the number of recipients sharing the same 
scan public key. In theory this is a backwards incompatible protocol change, 
in practice we believe that none of the existing SP wallets would be 
affected, 
for a reasonably high K_max (the example value used is K_max=1000, but this 
can be seen as a placeholder). 

See the following BIP change draft for more details and motivation: 
https://github.com/theStack/bips/commit/961d1442139ceecd6c0cc5775ef911d69aabed4c 

The discussion is on-going at the following issue: 
https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/issues/1799 [4] 

If you have any concerns or feedback for this change, either for currently 
existing wallets or potential future use-cases that you could think of, 
please 
comment there. Most SP wallet developers that we are aware of have already 
been 
pinged on the issue. We are posting this here to reach a wider audience and 
to 
provide an alternative opportunity to comment, in case anyone doesn't want 
to 
use GitHub. 

Best,
Sebastian

[1] https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/pull/1765 
[2] 
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/5d0f70a5cf4cfc429267cd6cc246ba3bcb949cb3/bip-0352.mediawiki?plain=1#L330 
[3] 
https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/pull/1698#pullrequestreview-3341766084 
[4] 
https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/issues/1799#issuecomment-3842046237 
ff. in particular

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bitcoindev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/b8edb433-c7b8-4d79-b710-e89a578eb42cn%40googlegroups.com.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 4884 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2026-02-04 17:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-04 17:20 Sebastian Falbesoner [this message]
2026-02-19 20:39 ` [bitcoindev] " Sebastian Falbesoner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b8edb433-c7b8-4d79-b710-e89a578eb42cn@googlegroups.com \
    --to=sebastian.falbesoner@gmail.com \
    --cc=bitcoindev@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox