I’m not convinced that restricting or discouraging non-transactional data is the right approach. While limiting data size may reduce certain abuses, it also constrains legitimate use cases that leverage Bitcoin’s data-carrying capabilities (e.g. commitments, metadata, or novel protocols). From a consensus-layer perspective, Bitcoin should remain neutral about how data is interpreted or used, as long as it follows the defined rules and pays the required fees. Imposing normative judgments about "spam" risks introducing subjective policy where objective validation should suffice.
Jameson -You mention "technical concerns" but don't give any examples. Would you mind sharing one?You also mention "the underlying implication of using legal coercion to require miners and other network participants to comply with arbitrary legal and moral frameworks", but I don't think the BIP implies this at all.The BIP merely highlights a legal risk Bitcoin Core 30 has created for node operators for no good reason, and attempts to eliminate it. No "coercion" is implied. You and anyone else who are fine shouldering this risk are free to stay on the old data-friendly chain. I doubt you will have much company, though.Best,DathonOn Sunday, October 26th, 2025 at 2:49 PM, Jameson Lopp <jameso...@gmail.com> wrote:
It's quite clear from the PR discussion that there are a multitude of contentious issues at play with this proposal.Even aside from all of the technical concerns, the underlying implication of using legal coercion to require miners and other network participants to comply with arbitrary legal and moral frameworks makes it a non-starter in my opinion.--On Sun, Oct 26, 2025 at 3:43 PM dathonohm via Bitcoin Development Mailing List <bitco...@googlegroups.com> wrote:Hi list -https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/2017Due to Bitcoin Core v30 gaining in popularity, it has become necessary to move forward on luke-jr's ML proposal to temporarily limit arbitrary data at the consensus level, which so far has 3 weeks with no objections:
The idea is to strongly re-affirm in consensus that bitcoin is money, not data storage. It is implemented as a temporary softfork that can activate in one of two different ways: proactive, or reactive.After a year, the soft fork expires, giving us time to come up with a more permanent solution.The timeline is a bit tight, but I think everyone has incentives to support a quick and orderly activation.Please feel free to leave a comment on the PR or reach out to me over email with any feedback.There is much work still to do, so if you have some technical skills and would like to join in the effort with dev/testing, please reach out as well.Bitcoin is money.Sincerely,Dathon Ohm --
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bitcoindev+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/AWiF9dIo9yjUF9RAs_NLwYdGK11BF8C8oEArR6Cys-rbcZ8_qs3RoJURqK3CqwCCWM_zwGFn5n3RECW_j5hGS01ntGzPLptqcOyOejunYsU%3D%40proton.me.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bitcoindev+...@googlegroups.com.To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/CADL_X_caKFvypdDa2k-Hhy1QCMJgnb6Rc8i0vBRW9%3Dyoq4h2ZA%40mail.gmail.com.