BIP 2: Promote to Active Status #350
pull luke-jr wants to merge 10 commits into bitcoin:master from luke-jr:bip0002_final changing 79 files +284 −5-
luke-jr commented at 7:02 pm on March 8, 2016: memberThis requires rough consensus from the bitcoin-dev mailing list to proceed.
-
Add License header to BIPs that have a clear Copyright section 4850ffe10f
-
Add licenses to my BIPs missing them 3bc04a6b3e
-
QA: Check for proper License header 64f6569a0b
-
QA: Allow for Comments-Summary and Comments-URI header fields 33e21704cd
-
Add Comments-* headers to all BIPs, and require them in QA a79525f216
-
bip-0002: Update Status to Final 7d23e0f182
-
Merge branch 'master' into bip0002_final 06ce7391d1
-
bip-0133: Update for BIP 2 739bb95ae5
-
luke-jr added the label Pending acceptance on Mar 8, 2016
-
README: Update BIP 2 Status to Final df54dba804
-
MarcoFalke commented at 7:28 pm on March 8, 2016: memberSo this would forbid to multi-license where one of the “licenses” is PD?
-
luke-jr commented at 8:02 pm on March 8, 2016: memberPD contradicts licensing, so it doesn’t make sense to “dual-license” with it.
-
MarcoFalke commented at 8:14 pm on March 8, 2016: memberFine with me, just wanted to make sure this is intended.
-
MarcoFalke commented at 8:14 pm on March 8, 2016: memberACK
-
btcdrak commented at 8:41 pm on March 8, 2016: contributorNACK on links to bitcoin.it wiki, BIPs should be self contained (e.g. use this Github repo’s wiki).
-
in bip-0018.mediawiki: in df54dba804 outdated
1@@ -2,9 +2,12 @@ 2 BIP: 18 3 Title: hashScriptCheck 4 Author: Luke Dashjr <luke+bip17@dashjr.org> 5+ Comments-Summary: No comments yet. 6+ Comments-URI: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/BIP_Comments:BIP_0018 7 Status: Draft 8 Type: Standards Track 9 Created: 2012-01-27 10+ License: BSD-3-Clause
btcdrak commented at 6:11 am on March 9, 2016:What is the providence of this license?
Edit: I see, you changing the license of your own BIPs.
luke-jr commented at 3:22 pm on March 9, 2016: memberPlease read the BIP and discuss on ML…MarcoFalke commented at 3:43 pm on March 9, 2016: memberNACK on links to bitcoin.it wiki,
What about only adding them when the accompanying wiki page exists? As I read BIP2, adding those is not mandatory:
Each BIP should, in its preamble, link to a Bitcoin Wiki page
laanwj commented at 12:07 pm on March 16, 2016: memberAs this is a process BIP, we’re not going to change the status to `Active’ like BIP1? ‘Final’ means it’s never meant to change again (just asking to be sure).
Some Informational and Process BIPs may also have a status of “Active” if they are never meant to be completed. E.g. BIP 1 (this BIP).
luke-jr renamed this:
BIP 2: Promote to Final Status
BIP 2: Promote to Active Status
on Mar 16, 2016BIP 2: Correct Status to Active 189ff30255luke-jr closed this on Mar 18, 2016
MarcoFalke cross-referenced this on Sep 23, 2016 from issue BIP 134: Flexible Transactions by zander
github-metadata-mirror
This is a metadata mirror of the GitHub repository bitcoin/bips. This site is not affiliated with GitHub. Content is generated from a GitHub metadata backup.
generated: 2024-10-30 05:10 UTC
This is a metadata mirror of the GitHub repository bitcoin/bips. This site is not affiliated with GitHub. Content is generated from a GitHub metadata backup.
generated: 2024-10-30 05:10 UTC
This site is hosted by @0xB10C
More mirrored repositories can be found on mirror.b10c.me
More mirrored repositories can be found on mirror.b10c.me