Removed link and reference to SLIP-0173 #1481
pull dplusplus1024 wants to merge 1 commits into bitcoin:master from dplusplus1024:patch-5 changing 1 files +0 −6-
dplusplus1024 commented at 5:25 am on July 23, 2023: contributorSLIP-0173 is not relevant to BIP173 due to not containing any additional information about bitcoin.
-
Removed link and reference to SLIP-0173
SLIP-0173 is not relevant to BIP173 due to not containing any additional information about bitcoin. Co-authored-by: Reese Russell <git@qrsnap.io>
-
apoelstra commented at 2:07 pm on July 23, 2023: contributorIt may be irrelevant to Bitcoin, but it redirects a common request about BIP-173, without needing any action from the BIP maintainer or others here.
-
clarkmoody commented at 1:50 pm on July 24, 2023: contributor
The SLIPs have been a bulwark against countless altcoin PRs directed at this repository. See SLIP-044 for a prime example.
-Clark
On Sun, Jul 23, 2023, 09:08 Andrew Poelstra @.***> wrote:
It may be irrelevant to Bitcoin, but it redirects a common request about BIP-173, without needing any action from the BIP maintainer or others here.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1481#issuecomment-1646849234, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAL5OMIPSVTS2NX6GW3NOT3XRUV4BANCNFSM6AAAAAA2UJBDWA . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
-
dplusplus1024 commented at 9:52 pm on July 24, 2023: contributor@apoelstra @clarkmoody Thank you both for responding. It is my perspective that linking these projects may be perceived as an official endorsement for them. However, I can understand the desire to stop needless PRs. The question is, what is more important - preventing PRs or preventing users from being led astray?
-
apoelstra commented at 5:49 pm on July 25, 2023: contributorI don’t think it’d be perceived as an “official endorsement”. Perhaps an “official acknowledgement”, but that’s fairly accurate – if we were to add new HRPs in Bitcoin for something, we would check SLIP-173 to avoid colliding, because it’s an easy check and it’s good social grace.
-
murchandamus commented at 6:45 pm on May 1, 2024: contributorIt sounds to me that the BIP authors declined this proposed change to their BIP.
-
murchandamus closed this on May 1, 2024
-
murchandamus reopened this on May 1, 2024
-
murchandamus commented at 6:47 pm on May 1, 2024: contributor
-
murchandamus assigned sipa on May 8, 2024
-
murchandamus added the label Proposed BIP modification on May 8, 2024
-
murchandamus added the label Pending acceptance on May 8, 2024
-
5twelve approved
github-metadata-mirror
This is a metadata mirror of the GitHub repository bitcoin/bips. This site is not affiliated with GitHub. Content is generated from a GitHub metadata backup.
generated: 2024-10-31 23:10 UTC
This is a metadata mirror of the GitHub repository bitcoin/bips. This site is not affiliated with GitHub. Content is generated from a GitHub metadata backup.
generated: 2024-10-31 23:10 UTC
This site is hosted by @0xB10C
More mirrored repositories can be found on mirror.b10c.me
More mirrored repositories can be found on mirror.b10c.me