BIP372, BIP381: editorial fixups #1740

1. 
   jonatack commented at 4:44 pm on January 6, 2025: member

   Merges and improves on the editorial spelling/grammar suggestions in #1720.

   Closes #1720.

2. BIP372, BIP381: trivial spelling fixups 450cdbbdaf
3. BIP372: editorial grammar fixups e36714eefa
4. jonatack merged this on Jan 6, 2025
5. jonatack closed this on Jan 6, 2025

   ---

6. jonatack deleted the branch on Jan 6, 2025
7. in bip-0372.mediawiki:122 in e36714eefa

   121-P2C tweaks commit to external data, some of which may represent certain value
   122-(like in some sidechains, single-use-seal applications like RGB etc). Creation
   123-of such outputs much allow hardware devices to understand the structure of such
   124+P2C tweaks commit to external data, some of which may represent certain values
   125+(like in some sidechains, single-use-seal applications like RGB, etc). Creation
   126+of such outputs may allow hardware devices to understand the structure of such
   

   ---

   ---

   

   theuni commented at 5:16 pm on January 6, 2025:

   This is a bit clunky before and after. I suspect “much allow” was supposed to be “must allow”, which would be more readable as “would require”.

   ---

   

   jonatack commented at 6:30 pm on January 6, 2025:

   Thanks for taking a look. @dr-orlovsky what is your intended meaning here?

   ---

   

   dr-orlovsky commented at 1:12 pm on January 7, 2025:

   Yes, it was “must allow” typo. “May allow” is more correct. “Would require” has an opposite meaning

   ---

   

   theuni commented at 9:10 pm on January 7, 2025:

   Happy to be wrong, thanks for chiming in!
8. 
   theuni commented at 5:21 pm on January 6, 2025: member

   Considering this isn’t just 1:1 spell-check fixes, it was merged a bit too quickly imo :(

   LGTM other than the comment. Considering the weight of the words “may”, “must”, etc, in BIPS, it would be nice to have another set of eyes on changes like this before merging.

9. 
   jonatack commented at 0:05 am on January 7, 2025: member

   @theuni that’s fair, thank you for the feedback, wouldn’t have hurt to wait a bit.
10. Scutua approved
11. Scutua approved
12. Scutua approved

Contributors
jonatack theuni dr-orlovsky Scutua