- 2 phase plan for increasing the block size
- Will update with BIP number if/when assigned one
BIP 107: Dynamic block size proposal #198
pull drwasho wants to merge 1 commits into bitcoin:master from drwasho:master changing 1 files +83 −0-
drwasho commented at 12:01 PM on September 13, 2015: contributor
-
6d97bf5c98
Dynamic block size proposal
Will update with BIP number if/when assigned one.
-
-
-
andre-amorim commented at 11:48 PM on September 19, 2015: none
x0
On 20 September 2015 at 00:36, Dr Washington Sanchez < notifications@github.com> wrote:
Thanks @luke-jr https://github.com/luke-jr
@gmaxwell https://github.com/gmaxwell could you please assign this with a BIP number? Thanks.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #198 (comment).
-
hoffmabc commented at 10:08 PM on September 20, 2015: none
What does x0 mean in this context @andre-amorim ?
- luke-jr added the label New BIP on Oct 23, 2015
- luke-jr assigned gmaxwell on Oct 23, 2015
- luke-jr added the label Needs number assignment on Oct 23, 2015
- luke-jr unassigned gmaxwell on Jan 8, 2016
- luke-jr assigned luke-jr on Jan 8, 2016
- luke-jr renamed this:
Dynamic block size proposal
BIP 107: Dynamic block size proposal
on Jan 8, 2016 - luke-jr removed the label Needs number assignment on Jan 8, 2016
- luke-jr merged this on Jan 8, 2016
- luke-jr closed this on Jan 8, 2016
-
-
andre-amorim commented at 6:38 AM on January 12, 2016: none
@drwasho sorry, Clarification, actually when I read "Please tag @gmaxwell " triggered in my mind his gpg/pgp server lookup, and sometimes you need to add x0 'KeyID 0x%k' STDIN, nevermind, I'll to not be impulsive or let race condition in my mind, see like now I'm thinking about mutex lock/unlock = 100 ns
Contributors
Labels