This proposal appears abandoned, as it has not had any updates in over four years, and cursory search did not produce any public discussions of it since it was published either.
cc: @pkvk
This proposal appears abandoned, as it has not had any updates in over four years, and cursory search did not produce any public discussions of it since it was published either.
cc: @pkvk
Concept ACK
Here are the relevant BIP 3 sections on this:
Closed
A BIP that is of historical interest only, and is not being actively worked on,
promoted or in active use, should be marked as Closed. The reason for moving the
proposal to (or from) Closed should be recorded in the Changelog section in the
same commit that updates the status.
Draft ↦ Closed
BIP authors may decide on their own to change their BIP’s status from Draft to Closed.
If a Draft BIP stops making progress, sees accumulated feedback unaddressed, or
otherwise appears stalled for a year, anyone may propose the BIP status be updated to
Closed. The BIP is then updated to Closed unless the authors assert that they intend to
continue work within four weeks of being contacted.
I have emailed Michael and Bogdan to provide them notice of this pull request. In absence of a response, this Status update may proceed after 2026-06-18.
Update: The email to the addresses in the BIP resulted in a delivery failure. I then emailed the Bitcoin Dev mailing list instead.
Concept ACK!
Concept ACK
The domain powx.org seems to still be active. I took the liberty to send a message in their contact form:
Dear Sir or Madam,
this is to give notice that there is an active proposal to move the Bitcoin Improvement Proposal 52 (BIP 52) proposal authored by Michael Dubrovsky mike+bip@powx.org and Bogdan Penkovsky bogdan+bip@powx.org entitled Durable, Low Energy Bitcoin PoW from the Draft status to Closed. Please find the relevant Pull Request here: #2165.
Regards. Edil Medeiros
Thanks @edilmedeiros! Good idea.
I updated this PR to add the Changelog.
This proposal appears abandoned, as it has not had any updates in over
four years, and cursory search did not produce any public discussions of
it since it was published either. Attempts to contact the authors did
not receive a response within four weeks.
Looks good to me! ACK 4894bcc4eb6ef852fa9a80ee8f196def6e2ee428
On an unrelated note, I didn't know that README.mediawiki had different background colors based on the status of the BIP! That's pretty cool, but apparently github doesn't display them :(
ACK 4894bcc4eb6ef852fa9a80ee8f196def6e2ee428