As per the meeting: http://www.erisian.com.au/meetbot/bitcoin-core-dev/2016/bitcoin-core-dev.2016-04-28-19.00.html
Updates BIP 144 to specify the use of the NODE_WTINESS service bit instead of a havewitness message.
As per the meeting: http://www.erisian.com.au/meetbot/bitcoin-core-dev/2016/bitcoin-core-dev.2016-04-28-19.00.html
Updates BIP 144 to specify the use of the NODE_WTINESS service bit instead of a havewitness message.
why he is trying to do that ? what for ? I'm here busy trying to read a paper ...
and on making the transition to computing centered on parallelism._/ development focused on improvements and innovations in parallel processing, nation place a much greater emphasis on IT and computer-science research and /_Committee on Sustaining Growth in Computing Performance recommends that our }»_J¥PS
On 28 April 2016 at 22:51, Andrew C notifications@github.com wrote:
As per the meeting: http://www.erisian.com.au/meetbot/bitcoin-core-dev/2016/bitcoin-core-dev.2016-04-28-19.00.html
Updates BIP 144 to specify the use of the NODE_WTINESS service bit instead
of a havewitness message.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
#380 Commit Summary
- Update to NODE_WITNESS service bit
File Changes
- M bip-0144.mediawiki https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/380/files#diff-0 (7)
Patch Links:
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #380
ACK