Draft for p2sh multisig wallet structure #89

pull maraoz wants to merge 1 commits into bitcoin:master from maraoz:p2sh-multisig-wallets changing 2 files +262 −0

maraoz commented at 5:22 PM on July 10, 2014: contributor

Discussion: https://www.mail-archive.com/bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net/msg05156.html
in bip-NNNN.mediawiki:None in 7a5daea025 outdated
```
  18 | +This BIP is a particular application of BIP43.
  19 | +
  20 | +==Motivation==
  21 | +
  22 | +The structure proposed in this document allows for standard ways to create,
  23 | +use, import, and HDPM wallets. It allows to handle multiple parties sharing
```
Michagogo commented at 5:42 PM on August 6, 2014:

Typo?

maraoz commented at 5:49 PM on August 6, 2014:

HDPM = hierarchical deterministic P2SH multi-signature, as defined above. Or is there another typo there? (I can't english)

Michagogo commented at 6:44 PM on August 6, 2014:

"create, use, import, and HDPM wallets."

I suspect what you mean is "create, use, and import HDPM wallets.", or maybe you accidentally a word and it should be "create, use, import, and <missingword> HDPM wallets."

maraoz commented at 6:47 PM on August 6, 2014:

You're right, thanks!
laanwj commented at 9:16 AM on October 15, 2014: member

This seems to be stuck?

As this has been discussed on the mailing list and the response is positive, I think you should move to the next phase and request a BIP number from gmaxwell.
maraoz commented at 11:29 AM on October 15, 2014: contributor

I already did, 3 times in the past 6 months. There's no rush but @gmaxwell has been unresponsive so far.

On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 6:16 AM, Wladimir J. van der Laan notifications@github.com wrote:

This seems to be stuck?

As this has been discussed on the mailing list and the response is positive, I think you should move to the next phase and request a BIP number from gmaxwell.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: #89 (comment)
laanwj commented at 12:08 PM on October 15, 2014: member

It wouldn't be the first time it takes a long time - @gmaxwell is very busy, but I don't think number allocation should be a blocker in the BIP process. As I've stated in the past, I think we need more BIP editors that can deal these out to avoid this.
gmaxwell commented at 4:46 PM on October 15, 2014: contributor

Gah. BIP 45.
maraoz force-pushed on Oct 17, 2014
maraoz commented at 5:06 PM on October 17, 2014: contributor

updated with assigned number
in .gitignore:None in 3d886672fe outdated
```
   0 | @@ -0,0 +1 @@
   1 | +*.swp
```
laanwj commented at 5:04 PM on October 21, 2014:

Please don't add a project-wide gitignore. Gitignore is meant for temporary files that are generated during the build process. We don't have a build system for bips, so there are none. There are various other ways in which you can see local ignore rules, see https://help.github.com/articles/ignoring-files/

maraoz commented at 5:35 PM on October 21, 2014:

Thanks for explaining! I didn't know about local ignore rules :)

in bip-0045.mediawiki:None in 3d886672fe outdated

   0 | @@ -0,0 +1,226 @@
   1 | +<pre>
   2 | +  BIP:     BIP-0045
   3 | +  Title:   Structure for Deterministic P2SH Multisignature Wallets
   4 | +  Authors: Manuel Araoz <manu@bitpay.com>
   5 | +           Ryan X. Charles <ryan@bitpay.com>
   6 | +           Matias Alejo Garcia <matias@bitpay.com>
   7 | +  Status:  Draft
   8 | +  Type:    Standards Track
   9 | +  Created: yyyy-mm-dd

laanwj commented at 5:05 PM on October 21, 2014:

Created date needs to be filled in

laanwj commented at 5:06 PM on October 21, 2014: member

Don't forget to add an entry in the table in https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/README.mediawiki
Add BIP 45 for "Structure for Deterministic P2SH Multisignature Wallets" bd0da6f44a
maraoz force-pushed on Oct 21, 2014
maraoz commented at 8:39 PM on October 21, 2014: contributor
updated:
- squashed commits
- added mailing list reference
- fixed @laanwj suggestions
- added more examples
laanwj referenced this in commit 6d120e62af on Oct 22, 2014
laanwj merged this on Oct 22, 2014
laanwj closed this on Oct 22, 2014

Contributors

Draft for p2sh multisig wallet structure #89

As this has been discussed on the mailing list and the response is positive, I think you should move to the next phase and request a BIP number from gmaxwell.