This links to a (basic) Python3 implementation which passes all the bip's test vectors.
There are already two links to Python implementations but both are using Python2,
which was EOL at the begining of the year.
#962 (comment)
bip-0032: remove the 'Implementations' section #962
pull darosior wants to merge 1 commits into bitcoin:master from darosior:bip32_python_implem changing 1 files +0 −25-
darosior commented at 10:23 PM on August 3, 2020: member
-
sipa commented at 10:35 PM on August 3, 2020: member
I think this list of implementations has outlived its usefulness. Nearly every Bitcoin library these days implements BIP32 - way more than are listed in the BIP - and as I don't have the time to review them all, I think listing some may be misinterpreted as an endorsement by the BIP's authors.
I think we should delete the entire section.
-
darosior commented at 10:37 PM on August 3, 2020: member
I understand the possibility of misinterpretation.
I could push a commit deleting it while i'm at it then.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Le mardi, août 4, 2020 12:35 AM, Pieter Wuille notifications@github.com a écrit :
I think this list of implementations has outlived its usefulness. Nearly every Bitcoin library these days implements BIP32 - way more than are listed in the BIP - and as I don't have the time to review them all, I think listing some may be misinterpreted as an endorsement by the BIP's authors.
I think we should delete the entire section.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
-
4bc05ff903
bip-0032: remove the 'Implementations' section
Signed-off-by: Antoine Poinsot <darosior@protonmail.com>
- darosior force-pushed on Aug 4, 2020
- darosior renamed this:
bip-0032: link to a Python3 implementation
bip-0032: remove the 'Implementations' section
on Aug 4, 2020 -
darosior commented at 10:18 AM on August 4, 2020: member
Pushed a commit which removes the section.
-
sipa commented at 7:47 PM on August 4, 2020: member
ACK, thanks!
- luke-jr merged this on Aug 20, 2020
- luke-jr closed this on Aug 20, 2020
-
rustyrussell commented at 2:05 AM on November 6, 2020: contributor
FYI: the commit which removed this does not have any explanation of why it was removed.
Please be more careful, as the base reasoning for a change belongs in the repository itself, not on GitHub which is naturally transient.
I would have simply quoted @sipa in the commit message in this case.
- sipa cross-referenced this on Aug 30, 2021 from issue Adding a C# implementation (dotblock) by dangershony
Contributors