[qt] Removed “Pay only the required fee” checkbox #13280

pull GreatSock wants to merge 3 commits into bitcoin:master from GreatSock:custom-fee changing 5 files +75 −49
  1. GreatSock commented at 1:59 pm on May 19, 2018: contributor

    This removes the “Pay only the required fee” checkbox from the custom transaction fee section in the SendCoinsDialog. Instead, a minimum value will be enforced on the custom fee input box.

    Before, a user could enter a fee below the minimum required fee but upon pressing send the resulting transaction would still pay the minimum fee. Now, if a user enters a value below the minimum fee the custom fee input box will be set to the minimum fee.

    Where the checkbox used to be, there is now a more general warning about low fees. The tooltip is still the same as before.

    image

  2. [qt] AmountField min/max value, allow empty option
    This adds functions for specifing a min/max value for a BitcoinAmountField. These options only affect user input, so it's still possible to use setValue to set values outside of the min/max range. The existing value will not be changed when calling these functions even if it's out of range. The min/max range will be reinforced when the field loses focus.
    This also adds an allow empty function which specifies if the field is allowed to be left empty by the user. If set to false the field will be set to the minimum allowed value if it's empty when focus is lost.
    123466cd22
  3. [qt] Removed pay only required fee checkbox
    Removes the pay only required fee checkbox from the custom transaction fee section in the SendCoinsDialog. It's replaced by a label giving a more general warning about low fees.
    The custom fee input box now has a minimum value equal to the minimum required fee. Before a value below the minimum fee could be entered which was confusing since the minimum fee would still be paid even though a lower amount was entered.
    4577166830
  4. in src/qt/bitcoinamountfield.cpp:62 in 123466cd22 outdated
    61+            valid = false;
    62+            val = parse(input, &valid);
    63+        }
    64+
    65+        if (valid) {
    66+            if (val < min_amount) {
    


    promag commented at 2:15 pm on May 19, 2018:
  5. in src/qt/bitcoinamountfield.cpp:104 in 123466cd22 outdated
    100     {
    101         bool valid = false;
    102         CAmount val = value(&valid);
    103         val = val + steps * singleStep;
    104-        val = qMin(qMax(val, CAmount(0)), BitcoinUnits::maxMoney());
    105+        val = qMin(qMax(val, CAmount(min_amount)), max_amount);
    


    promag commented at 2:15 pm on May 19, 2018:
  6. promag commented at 2:16 pm on May 19, 2018: member
    Concept ACK. Will test.
  7. [qt] BitcoinAmountField use qBound 7908f18b13
  8. GreatSock commented at 2:52 pm on May 19, 2018: contributor

    Any idea why the Travis build failed after changing to qBound?

    Edit: Nevermind! Seems to have passed now

  9. laanwj added the label GUI on May 19, 2018
  10. jonasschnelli commented at 8:41 am on May 25, 2018: contributor
    Concept ACK
  11. promag commented at 11:26 pm on June 1, 2018: member
    It would be nice to see a previous screenshot. I forgot to test this 🙄
  12. in src/qt/bitcoinamountfield.cpp:31 in 7908f18b13
    24@@ -25,7 +25,10 @@ class AmountSpinBox: public QAbstractSpinBox
    25     explicit AmountSpinBox(QWidget *parent):
    26         QAbstractSpinBox(parent),
    27         currentUnit(BitcoinUnits::BTC),
    28-        singleStep(100000) // satoshis
    29+        singleStep(100000), // satoshis
    30+        allow_empty(true),
    31+        min_amount(0),
    32+        max_amount(BitcoinUnits::maxMoney())
    


    MarcoFalke commented at 3:25 pm on July 22, 2018:
    Please initialize non-static class members directly where they are declared.
  13. in src/qt/bitcoinamountfield.cpp:161 in 7908f18b13
    155@@ -129,6 +156,10 @@ class AmountSpinBox: public QAbstractSpinBox
    156     CAmount singleStep;
    157     mutable QSize cachedMinimumSizeHint;
    158 
    159+    bool allow_empty;
    160+    CAmount min_amount;
    161+    CAmount max_amount;
    


    MarcoFalke commented at 3:26 pm on July 22, 2018:
    Please prefix class members with m_, according to the developer notes.
  14. MarcoFalke approved
  15. MarcoFalke commented at 3:28 pm on July 22, 2018: member

    utACK. Please adjust the code to the developer notes (see two comments)

    Also, might want to squash the third commit into one of the earlier ones.

    Finally, add empty new lines after the git commit subject line. Otherwise, the commit subject can not be parsed properly.

  16. DrahtBot commented at 11:49 pm on July 22, 2018: member
  17. DrahtBot closed this on Jul 22, 2018

  18. DrahtBot reopened this on Jul 22, 2018

  19. MarcoFalke added this to the milestone 0.18.0 on Jul 29, 2018
  20. MarcoFalke commented at 4:07 pm on July 29, 2018: member
    @GreatSock Are you still working on this?
  21. MarcoFalke added the label Up for grabs on Aug 20, 2018
  22. DrahtBot commented at 10:36 am on August 21, 2018: member
  23. DrahtBot added the label Needs rebase on Aug 21, 2018
  24. Sjors commented at 8:02 pm on September 7, 2018: member

    Concept ACK, less UI clutter is great, and it gets rid of a duplicate tooltip.

    Also thanks for switching to qBound.

    To clarify the minimum fee a bit, as well as make way for a potential future decrease, maybe change the tooltip from:

    Paying only the minimum fee is just fine as long as there is less transaction volume than space in the blocks. But be aware that this can end up in a never confirming transaction once there is more demand for bitcoin transactions than the network can process.

    To:

    When there is less transaction volume than space in the blocks, miners as well as relaying nodes may enforce a minimum fee. Paying only this minimum fee is just fine, but be aware that this can result in a never confirming transaction once there is more demand for bitcoin transactions than the network can process.

    Removing the checkbox breaks horizontal alignment. The text needs be aligned with “Confirmation time target”:

  25. Sjors commented at 8:40 am on October 30, 2018: member

    @hebasto said on IRC:

    provoostenator: hi! have you took #13280 over or it is still up for grabs?

    Not yet, feel free to and I can review it.

  26. fanquake commented at 9:25 am on October 30, 2018: member
    I’ll close this then. hebasto can cherry-pick and open a new PR when ready.
  27. fanquake closed this on Oct 30, 2018

  28. MarcoFalke removed the label Needs rebase on Oct 30, 2018
  29. MarcoFalke removed the label Up for grabs on Oct 30, 2018
  30. jonasschnelli referenced this in commit 083f535470 on Nov 13, 2018
  31. christiancfifi referenced this in commit b63de04c75 on Aug 27, 2021
  32. christiancfifi referenced this in commit 8816d1aacc on Aug 27, 2021
  33. christiancfifi referenced this in commit f084b84d41 on Aug 27, 2021
  34. christiancfifi referenced this in commit 786dbd0c91 on Aug 28, 2021
  35. christiancfifi referenced this in commit 8ca36a34a8 on Aug 29, 2021
  36. christiancfifi referenced this in commit 4ae3653004 on Aug 29, 2021
  37. christiancfifi referenced this in commit 1457eda124 on Aug 29, 2021
  38. DrahtBot locked this on Sep 8, 2021

github-metadata-mirror

This is a metadata mirror of the GitHub repository bitcoin/bitcoin. This site is not affiliated with GitHub. Content is generated from a GitHub metadata backup.
generated: 2024-12-18 18:12 UTC

This site is hosted by @0xB10C
More mirrored repositories can be found on mirror.b10c.me