Move interfaces/* from libbitcoin_util to libbitcoin_server.
Usage of these is shared between bitcoind and bitcoin-qt. It is unnecessary for them to be linked against the other utilities. Also semantically they belong with the server/node, I think.
These are shared between bitcoind and bitcoin-qt. It is unnecessary for
them to be linked against the other utilities.
Concept ACK
<!--e57a25ab6845829454e8d69fc972939a-->Note to reviewers: This pull request conflicts with the following ones:
If you consider this pull request important, please also help to review the conflicting pull requests. Ideally, start with the one that should be merged first.
How about multi-process? Are the interface headers enough for the wallet process?
Great! tACK e0664f7f54aa9cf99ba31ca4bd9de1db0a9310a4
How about multi-process? Are the interface headers enough for the wallet process?
I'd say we cross that bridge when we have to. For now, this makes sense.
And also in that case, another library might have to be defined that has compilation units shared between the wallet process producer/consumer. Even then these things don't belong in the generic util library.
I'd say we cross that bridge when we have to. For now, this makes sense.
:+1: no sense in holding up obvious improvements now for something that may or may not come in the future.
utACK e0664f7f54aa9cf99ba31ca4bd9de1db0a9310a4
Yeap agree! utACK e0664f7.