Qt: Add antialiasing to traffic graph widget #16153

pull JosuGZ wants to merge 1 commits into bitcoin:master from JosuGZ:antialiasing changing 1 files +1 −0
  1. JosuGZ commented at 4:49 pm on June 5, 2019: contributor

    Before:

    image

    After:

    image

  2. fanquake added the label GUI on Jun 5, 2019
  3. in src/qt/trafficgraphwidget.cpp:68 in a89c808af5 outdated
    64@@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ void TrafficGraphWidget::paintPath(QPainterPath &path, QQueue<float> &samples)
    65 void TrafficGraphWidget::paintEvent(QPaintEvent *)
    66 {
    67     QPainter painter(this);
    68+    painter.setRenderHints(painter.renderHints() | QPainter::Antialiasing);
    


    promag commented at 5:00 pm on June 5, 2019:
    Not sure if relevant but could be after fill?

    JosuGZ commented at 6:55 pm on June 5, 2019:
    I believe configuration should come before usage.

    promag commented at 2:20 pm on June 6, 2019:

    You can change render hints at any time.

    Anyway, you can simplify this:

    0painter.setRenderHint(QPainter::Antialiasing);
    

    JosuGZ commented at 4:40 pm on June 6, 2019:

    You can, but should you?

    Your suggestion is good, pushing.


    promag commented at 4:53 pm on June 6, 2019:

    You can, but should you?

    It depends if fillRect is faster without antialiasing - in this case it might make no difference as the rect is aligned and fills the entire surface.

    More generally when you “paint/compose” an image you might want some parts/primitives antialiased and others not.

  4. promag commented at 6:22 pm on June 5, 2019: member
    Concept ACK. Can you check if rounded join style looks better? See https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qpen.html#join-style.
  5. JosuGZ commented at 7:11 pm on June 5, 2019: contributor

    Concept ACK. Can you check if rounded join style looks better? See https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qpen.html#join-style.

    That is a different part of the code. I can’t really see the difference, probably because the points are too close. It looks like this:

    image

    I can push the change anyway.

     0diff --git a/src/qt/trafficgraphwidget.cpp b/src/qt/trafficgraphwidget.cpp
     1index 97a8599fb..4c245ad0c 100644
     2--- a/src/qt/trafficgraphwidget.cpp
     3+++ b/src/qt/trafficgraphwidget.cpp
     4@@ -109,14 +109,18 @@ void TrafficGraphWidget::paintEvent(QPaintEvent *)
     5         QPainterPath p;
     6         paintPath(p, vSamplesIn);
     7         painter.fillPath(p, QColor(0, 255, 0, 128));
     8-        painter.setPen(Qt::green);
     9+        QPen pen(Qt::green);
    10+        pen.setJoinStyle(Qt::RoundJoin);
    11+        painter.setPen(pen);
    12         painter.drawPath(p);
    13     }
    14     if(!vSamplesOut.empty()) {
    15         QPainterPath p;
    16         paintPath(p, vSamplesOut);
    17         painter.fillPath(p, QColor(255, 0, 0, 128));
    18-        painter.setPen(Qt::red);
    19+        QPen pen(Qt::red);
    20+        pen.setJoinStyle(Qt::RoundJoin);
    21+        painter.setPen(pen);
    22         painter.drawPath(p);
    23     }
    24 }
    

    If I have time I might play a bit with the whole graph to make it better though. That was initially my idea but this fix was simple and looks much better :)

  6. laanwj commented at 8:50 am on June 6, 2019: member
    ACK Code change and result looks good to me, haven’t tested, we should probably try it out on a few OSes to be sure the setting doesn’t cause problems.
  7. MarcoFalke added the label Needs gitian build on Jun 6, 2019
  8. promag commented at 2:24 pm on June 6, 2019: member

    That is a different part of the code. I can’t really see the difference, probably because the points are too close. It looks like this:

    Thanks for testing, I’ve also checked it.

    I think this is a nice improvement and it doesn’t take more CPU to be that noticeable (measured in macos with instruments with and without this change).

    Other visual improvements are possible but this is fine as it is. ACK a89c808.

  9. jonasschnelli commented at 2:42 pm on June 6, 2019: contributor
    Tested on OSX with HiDPI (retina) screen and I can’t see any difference. I believe that using HiDPI on OSX sets antialiasing by default (unsure though).
  10. JosuGZ force-pushed on Jun 6, 2019
  11. promag commented at 5:01 pm on June 6, 2019: member
    ACK 4211bdb.
  12. hebasto commented at 11:48 am on June 7, 2019: member

    https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qpainter.html#rendering-quality:

    The QPainter class also provides a means of controlling the rendering quality through its RenderHint enum and the support for floating point precision: All the functions for drawing primitives has a floating point version. These are often used in combination with the QPainter::Antialiasing render hint.

    Could using of floating point versions for drawing primitives (e.g., QLineF) be considered?

  13. DrahtBot commented at 11:10 pm on June 8, 2019: member

    Gitian builds for commit 5d2ccf0ce9ca1571c650a69319fb9c1e0b626ecb (master):

    Gitian builds for commit 28af91115fb83010bf2675796bfd635766ecf537 (master and this pull):

  14. DrahtBot removed the label Needs gitian build on Jun 8, 2019
  15. promag commented at 10:58 pm on June 12, 2019: member
    @hebasto changed coordinates to float but result is apparently the same, so I don’t think it’s worth the change. @JosuGZ I still think you should enable antialiasing only on L106 (I’ve tested it), this way the grid is always crisp - you can see on your screenshots that the horizontal lines are blurred and a bit darker.
  16. laanwj commented at 1:01 pm on June 13, 2019: member

    @JosuGZ I still think you should enable antialiasing only on L106 (I’ve tested it), this way the grid is always crisp - you can see on your screenshots that the horizontal lines are blurred and a bit darker.

    Good catch, I think I agree, anti-aliasing improves diagonal lines but for axis-aligned lines (and the grid is that, by definition) it can make it look blurrier for no good reason.

  17. fanquake added the label Waiting for author on Jun 14, 2019
  18. laanwj commented at 6:18 pm on June 25, 2019: member
    @JosuGZ at least please reply to the comments (even if you disagree)
  19. JosuGZ commented at 2:15 pm on June 26, 2019: contributor

    @JosuGZ at least please reply to the comments (even if you disagree)

    Hi, I haven’t been on my Linux machine these days so I was waiting for that.

    About horizontal and vertical lines: I think it is pointless to disable it as I don’t think performance should be an issue, and sometimes lines fall between 2 pixels (if using floats, which I recall it has been mentioned). I could do it though. Same for enabling antialiasing after filling the rect with black, this one at least does not add complexity.

    When I’m on it I will review a little more and I will comment.

  20. JosuGZ commented at 2:19 pm on June 26, 2019: contributor
    Do you think horizontal lines look better without antialiasing?
  21. fanquake removed the label Waiting for author on Jul 2, 2019
  22. fanquake commented at 3:50 am on July 2, 2019: member
    @JosuGZ Can you please squash your commits.
  23. Add antialiasing to traffic graph widget db26e8e228
  24. JosuGZ force-pushed on Jul 2, 2019
  25. laanwj commented at 5:00 pm on July 2, 2019: member
    ACK db26e8e22822c65a3817b16805f5ba9ad2235f93
  26. laanwj merged this on Jul 2, 2019
  27. laanwj closed this on Jul 2, 2019

  28. laanwj referenced this in commit 4db2f8cf0f on Jul 2, 2019
  29. promag commented at 5:03 pm on July 2, 2019: member
    ACK db26e8e, could you update OP screenshots?
  30. JosuGZ commented at 8:42 pm on July 2, 2019: contributor

    ACK db26e8e, could you update OP screenshots?

    Done!

    Not sure if it’s useful now :P

  31. promag commented at 8:47 pm on July 2, 2019: member
    Thanks! it can be for forks :trollface:
  32. luke-jr referenced this in commit 91805487f6 on Sep 3, 2019
  33. jasonbcox referenced this in commit aa80b9c746 on Oct 8, 2020
  34. barton2526 referenced this in commit 36835f2932 on May 26, 2021
  35. kittywhiskers referenced this in commit 2cf1075854 on Nov 3, 2021
  36. Munkybooty referenced this in commit 8bb20061dc on Nov 4, 2021
  37. kittywhiskers referenced this in commit 61084394a2 on Nov 4, 2021
  38. kittywhiskers referenced this in commit 6f98a32403 on Nov 11, 2021
  39. Munkybooty referenced this in commit 7edc856d57 on Nov 12, 2021
  40. Munkybooty referenced this in commit 0aac6acd4f on Nov 16, 2021
  41. pravblockc referenced this in commit 0d74ae2ac4 on Nov 18, 2021
  42. Munkybooty referenced this in commit bc29164aec on Nov 18, 2021
  43. DrahtBot locked this on Dec 16, 2021

github-metadata-mirror

This is a metadata mirror of the GitHub repository bitcoin/bitcoin. This site is not affiliated with GitHub. Content is generated from a GitHub metadata backup.
generated: 2024-10-04 22:12 UTC

This site is hosted by @0xB10C
More mirrored repositories can be found on mirror.b10c.me