Using a direct list initialization for struct Arg
objects makes the constructor needless.
This PR has been split out from #16097 (see: #16097 (comment)).
Using a direct list initialization for struct Arg
objects makes the constructor needless.
This PR has been split out from #16097 (see: #16097 (comment)).
546@@ -547,7 +547,7 @@ void ArgsManager::AddArg(const std::string& name, const std::string& help, const
547
548 LOCK(cs_args);
549 std::map<std::string, Arg>& arg_map = m_available_args[cat];
550- auto ret = arg_map.emplace(name.substr(0, eq_index), Arg(name.substr(eq_index, name.size() - eq_index), help, debug_only));
551+ auto ret = arg_map.emplace(name.substr(0, eq_index), Arg{name.substr(eq_index, name.size() - eq_index), help, debug_only});
Arg
?
Can’t test at the moment but I think you could drop
Arg
?
It won’t work if a type is automatically deduced: auto ret = ...
146@@ -147,8 +147,6 @@ class ArgsManager
147 std::string m_help_param;
148 std::string m_help_text;
149 bool m_debug_only;