We're about ready to do a 0.19.1 release; so I've opened this to collect the last remaining backports.
If there's something that's been missed / or isn't tagged "Needs backport (0.19)" that you think should be, please comment.
Currently backports:
We're about ready to do a 0.19.1 release; so I've opened this to collect the last remaining backports.
If there's something that's been missed / or isn't tagged "Needs backport (0.19)" that you think should be, please comment.
Currently backports:
The macos manpage for fcntl (for F_PEOFPOSMODE) states:
> Allocate from the physical end of file. In this case, fst_length indicates the number of newly allocated bytes desired.
Github-Pull: #17887
Rebased-From: 75163f4729c10c40d2843da28a8c79ab89193f6a
Github-Pull: #17980
Rebased-From: a5a2654bbc43b5c208418872e5d4c0acbadda5de
@laanwj It is not vital, but its absence does result in a few GBs of wasted space for anyone doing IBD on 0.19. That's for non-pruned nodes only, so it may very well be the case that a few GBs is negligible for a 250 GB datadir. (IMO hell no, but both @Sjors and @MarcoFalke disagree.)
@kallewoof Thank you! That doesn't seem too bad to me, though if it's virtually ready for merge, and the risk isn't too high it would be good to include. I'll wait for them to weigh in. Let's aim for tagging 0.19.1rc1 after today's meeting.
Edit: discussion is in #17892 , not here
ACK daf2fff236f8ebb75c785b33d2dd6dcd3cf86112
Milestone
0.19.1