walletdb: Don’t remove database transaction logs and instead error #18907

pull achow101 wants to merge 1 commits into bitcoin:master from achow101:dont-retry-bdbenv changing 3 files +16 −24
  1. achow101 commented at 6:35 pm on May 7, 2020: member

    Instead of removing the database transaction logs and retrying the wallet loading, just return an error message to the user. Additionally, speciically for DB_RUNRECOVERY, notify the user that this could be due to different BDB versions.

    Kind of implements the suggestion from #18870 (review)

  2. DrahtBot added the label Wallet on May 7, 2020
  3. ryanofsky commented at 7:39 pm on May 7, 2020: member

    Concept ACK c1029c6ff3e58a64d0b07515f92938a717a42a02. This removes database loading with no logs behavior implemented in #2558 1859aafef0a273e27e886646e36140cc5e375ee1, which hopefully should be unnecessary now that the wallet flushes very frequently.

    This change should reduce chances for data loss and provide better error feedback if there’s an unsuccessful attempt to load newer bdb logs with an older version of bdb. It also simplifies the wallet opening code.

    It’s possible this PR could cause new errors for users who weren’t seeing errors before. If this happens we could add an easier to use manual recovery option, or implement a middle-ground automatic approach like #18870 (review) that will retry loading the wallet without log files as long as the log files came from a compatible bdb version.

  4. DrahtBot commented at 3:49 am on May 14, 2020: member

    The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.

    Conflicts

    Reviewers, this pull request conflicts with the following ones:

    • #19457 (wallet: Cleanup wallettool salvage and walletdb extraneous declarations by achow101)
    • #19335 (wallet: Cleanup and separate BerkeleyDatabase and BerkeleyBatch by achow101)

    If you consider this pull request important, please also help to review the conflicting pull requests. Ideally, start with the one that should be merged first.

  5. ryanofsky approved
  6. ryanofsky commented at 2:37 pm on May 14, 2020: member
    Code review ACK c1029c6ff3e58a64d0b07515f92938a717a42a02. I wrote a test for this (feel free to steal) in f68911f954ba62f5e0f69569a2bf2c8c0acd890f (branch)
  7. ryanofsky commented at 7:14 pm on May 19, 2020: member

    Some travis failures here. One in rpc_rawtransaction appears to be spurious https://travis-ci.org/github/bitcoin/bitcoin/jobs/684393890#L5036:

    02020-05-07T18:54:10.222000Z TestFramework (ERROR): Unexpected exception caught during testing
    1Traceback (most recent call last):
    2  File "/home/travis/build/bitcoin/bitcoin/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 114, in main
    3    self.run_test()
    4  File "/home/travis/build/bitcoin/bitcoin/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/test/functional/rpc_rawtransaction.py", line 299, in run_test
    5    vout = next(o for o in rawTx['vout'] if o['value'] == Decimal('2.20000000'))
    6StopIteration
    

    Other two failures in wallet_tool test seem to be the result of changed error strings https://travis-ci.org/github/bitcoin/bitcoin/jobs/684393889#L3118 and https://travis-ci.org/github/bitcoin/bitcoin/jobs/684393892#L4350:

    0AssertionError: not(Error loading wallet.dat. Is wallet being used by other process? == Error initializing wallet database environment "/home/travis/build/bitcoin/bitcoin/ci/scratch/test_runner/test_runner_₿_🏃_20200507_184719/tool_wallet_117/node0/regtest/wallets"!
    
    0  File "/home/travis/build/bitcoin/bitcoin/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-i686-pc-linux-gnu/test/functional/tool_wallet.py", line 39, in assert_raises_tool_error
    1    assert_equal(stderr.strip(), error)
    
  8. achow101 force-pushed on May 19, 2020
  9. achow101 commented at 7:18 pm on May 19, 2020: member
    Cherrypicked the test and I think I’ve fixed the other test failures.
  10. ryanofsky approved
  11. ryanofsky commented at 9:14 pm on May 19, 2020: member

    Code review ACK 38ac29c1e8e862669c2c1fe8d9ddbced8fb53392. Changes since last review were removing bdb error strings from error messages to deal with failing travis tests and adding new python test (thanks). It’d be nice if we could include detailed bdb error messages and fix the broken travis tests to be less sensitive, but no need for that here.

    Travis is failing again currently because test_runner test list is out of date. Errors are “WARNING! The following scripts are not being run: [‘wallet_db.py’]. Check the test lists in test_runner.py.” https://travis-ci.org/github/bitcoin/bitcoin/jobs/688954958#L3332

  12. achow101 commented at 9:49 pm on May 19, 2020: member

    Travis is failing again currently because test_runner test list is o

    Fixed

  13. achow101 force-pushed on May 19, 2020
  14. MarcoFalke commented at 0:00 am on May 20, 2020: member
    ci is failing. You might have to add a suppression to ./test/sanitizer_suppressions/lsan
  15. ryanofsky commented at 0:02 am on May 20, 2020: member

    Apparently the new wallet_db.py test exposes a memory leak that happens when BerkeleyEnvironment::Open fails: https://travis-ci.org/github/bitcoin/bitcoin/jobs/689013660#L4659

    I didn’t look closely, but in case the leak does not seem to be something obvious, I’d forgive you if you just want to drop the test here and pretend the leak isn’t happening. (I’m assuming it is pre-existing.) I can follow up with the test in another PR.

  16. achow101 commented at 5:31 pm on May 20, 2020: member
    I think I’ve fixed the memory leak.
  17. achow101 force-pushed on May 20, 2020
  18. achow101 commented at 8:03 pm on May 20, 2020: member
    Hmm. Guess that didn’t fix it. I think I’ll just ignore this leak for now. I think this leak also exists on master, so it’s not a regression.
  19. ryanofsky approved
  20. ryanofsky commented at 10:23 pm on May 20, 2020: member
    Code review ACK 274b9909f64aa617eb322850b799bc38c04f5f0c. Only change since last review is dropping the test which exposed the memory leak. Agree it looks like the memory leak is probably in current code and just exposed by the test. This PR is just basically just removing code, and nothing that’s been removed looks like it is freeing memory. I’ll file an issue for fixing the memory leak and adding back the test
  21. ryanofsky commented at 10:39 pm on May 20, 2020: member

    re: #18907#pullrequestreview-415756008

    I’ll file an issue for fixing the memory leak and adding back the test

    Filed #19034

  22. in src/wallet/db.cpp:219 in 274b9909f6 outdated
    230-            }
    231-        } else {
    232-            return false;
    233+        err = strprintf(_("Error initializing wallet database environment %s!"), Directory());
    234+        if (ret == DB_RUNRECOVERY) {
    235+            err = strprintf(_("Error initializing wallet database environment %s! This error could occur if this wallet was not shutdown cleanly and was last loaded using a build with a newver version of Berkeley DB. If so, please use the software that last loaded this wallet"), Directory());
    


    MarcoFalke commented at 12:56 pm on May 21, 2020:
    0            err += Untranslated(" ") + _("This error could occur if this wallet was not shutdown cleanly and was last loaded using a build with a newer version of Berkeley DB. If so, please use the software that last loaded this wallet");
    

    There is a typo in the translation message. Also, this can be written shorter by just appending the more precise reason. (You might have to rebase, to get the + operators)


    achow101 commented at 5:16 pm on May 21, 2020:
    Will fix if I have to push another change.

    achow101 commented at 2:49 pm on June 17, 2020:
    Done
  23. MarcoFalke commented at 12:56 pm on May 21, 2020: member
    left a nit
  24. DrahtBot added the label Needs rebase on Jun 17, 2020
  25. achow101 force-pushed on Jun 17, 2020
  26. achow101 force-pushed on Jun 17, 2020
  27. DrahtBot removed the label Needs rebase on Jun 17, 2020
  28. ryanofsky approved
  29. ryanofsky commented at 10:53 pm on June 18, 2020: member
    Code review ACK c2faa3432241d15f8d0a9968ba46cc0eef7fe21f. No changes since last review except rebase and translation string tweak
  30. in src/wallet/bdb.cpp:194 in c2faa34322 outdated
    205-            }
    206-        } else {
    207-            return false;
    208+        err = strprintf(_("Error initializing wallet database environment %s!"), Directory());
    209+        if (ret == DB_RUNRECOVERY) {
    210+            err += Untranslated(" ") + _("This error could occur if this wallet was not shutdown cleanly and was last loaded using a build with a newver version of Berkeley DB. If so, please use the software that last loaded this wallet");
    


    Sjors commented at 8:56 am on June 29, 2020:
    nit: newver typo

    achow101 commented at 3:18 pm on July 11, 2020:
    Fixed.
  31. Sjors approved
  32. Sjors commented at 9:46 am on June 29, 2020: member

    tACK c2faa34 on macOS 10.15.5

    I tested a few scenario’s. First I created a fresh wallet with bdb 18.

    1. It closed it normally, recompiled with bdb4.8 and loaded it. That fails with Wallet file verification fails. wallet.dat corrupt. Try using the wallet tool bitcoin-wallet to salvage or restoring a backup.. Same error with or without this commit; bdb 18 is probably just too new.

    2. While the bdb18 wallet was open, I copied the database directory. I then closed Bitcoin QT and copied the directory back. I then opened it, without this PR, and it renamed the directory to .bak. Same error as above.

    3. Same as (2), but with this PR, now I get the new error message.

    The commit message could be more clear that this error is only triggered for users who manually compiled with a newer BDB version.

    Nit: speciically typo in commit message

  33. achow101 commented at 3:13 pm on June 29, 2020: member

    Same error with or without this commit; bdb 18 is probably just too new.

    It is. The best version to test with is probably 5.x as it will produce compatible/identical wallet.dat files but incompatible logs.

  34. meshcollider commented at 9:52 am on July 11, 2020: contributor

    utACK c2faa3432241d15f8d0a9968ba46cc0eef7fe21f

    With three ACKs this can go in despite the annoyingly obvious typo ;)

    EDIT: there is a build error so you can fix the typo now

    0wallet/salvage.cpp: In function bool RecoverDatabaseFile(const boost::filesystem::path&):
    1wallet/salvage.cpp:23:36: error: no matching function for call to BerkeleyEnvironment::Open(bool)
    2     if (!env->Open(true /* retry */)) {
    
  35. achow101 force-pushed on Jul 11, 2020
  36. achow101 commented at 3:19 pm on July 11, 2020: member
    Had to rebase. Fixed the typo and added a bit to the commit message.
  37. walletdb: Don't remove database transaction logs and instead error
    Instead of removing the database transaction logs and retrying the
    wallet loading, just return an error message to the user. Additionally,
    specifically for DB_RUNRECOVERY, notify the user that this could be due
    to different BDB versions. This error is pretty much only caused by
    compiling with a newer version of BDB and then trying to open the wallet
    with a version compiled with an older version of BDB.
    d0ea9bab28
  38. achow101 force-pushed on Jul 13, 2020
  39. Sjors commented at 7:00 pm on July 14, 2020: member
    re-utACK d0ea9bab2804928c9f40def61fd99064d2d8f9b8
  40. ryanofsky approved
  41. ryanofsky commented at 8:47 pm on July 21, 2020: member
    Code review ACK d0ea9bab2804928c9f40def61fd99064d2d8f9b8. Only changes since last review are rebase and expanding error and commit messages.
  42. MarcoFalke commented at 6:56 am on July 22, 2020: member

    Tested:

     0$  ./src/bitcoin-cli -regtest getnewaddress
     12020-07-22T06:50:11Z [default wallet] keypool reserve 2
     22020-07-22T06:50:11Z [default wallet] keypool keep 2
     3bitcoind: wallet/rpcwallet.cpp:278: UniValue getnewaddress(const JSONRPCRequest&): Assertion `false' failed.
     4error: Could not connect to the server 127.0.0.1:18443 (error code 1 - "EOF reached")
     5
     6Make sure the bitcoind server is running and that you are connecting to the correct RPC port.
     7[2]-  Aborted                 (core dumped) ./src/bitcoind -regtest
     8
     9
    10
    11$ ls ~/.bitcoin/regtest/wallets/
    12database  db.log  wallet.dat
    13
    14
    15$ ./src/bitcoind-with-older-bdb -regtest  
    16...
    172020-07-22T06:55:42Z Using wallet directory /root/.bitcoin/regtest/wallets
    182020-07-22T06:55:42Z init message: Verifying wallet(s)...
    192020-07-22T06:55:42Z Using BerkeleyDB version Berkeley DB 4.8.30: (April  9, 2010)
    202020-07-22T06:55:42Z Using wallet /root/.bitcoin/regtest/wallets/wallet.dat
    212020-07-22T06:55:42Z BerkeleyEnvironment::Open: LogDir=/root/.bitcoin/regtest/wallets/database ErrorFile=/root/.bitcoin/regtest/wallets/db.log
    222020-07-22T06:55:42Z BerkeleyEnvironment::Open: Error -30974 opening database environment: DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery
    232020-07-22T06:55:42Z Error: Error initializing wallet database environment "/root/.bitcoin/regtest/wallets"! This error could occur if this wallet was not shutdown cleanly and was last loaded using a build with a newer version of Berkeley DB. If so, please use the software that last loaded this wallet
    24Error: Error initializing wallet database environment "/root/.bitcoin/regtest/wallets"! This error could occur if this wallet was not shutdown cleanly and was last loaded using a build with a newer version of Berkeley DB. If so, please use the software that last loaded this wallet
    252020-07-22T06:55:42Z Shutdown: In progress...
    262020-07-22T06:55:42Z scheduler thread exit
    272020-07-22T06:55:42Z Shutdown: done
    
  43. in src/wallet/bdb.cpp:334 in d0ea9bab28
    329@@ -342,7 +330,8 @@ BerkeleyBatch::BerkeleyBatch(BerkeleyDatabase& database, const char* pszMode, bo
    330 
    331     {
    332         LOCK(cs_db);
    333-        if (!env->Open(false /* retry */))
    334+        bilingual_str open_err;
    335+        if (!env->Open(open_err))
    


    MarcoFalke commented at 6:59 am on July 22, 2020:

    style-nit: Could upgrade to the new style while touching the line

    0        if (!env->Open(open_err)) {
    
  44. MarcoFalke merged this on Jul 22, 2020
  45. MarcoFalke closed this on Jul 22, 2020

  46. sidhujag referenced this in commit 39bd69b200 on Jul 24, 2020
  47. deadalnix referenced this in commit 7e286043e4 on Jun 8, 2021
  48. DrahtBot locked this on Feb 15, 2022

github-metadata-mirror

This is a metadata mirror of the GitHub repository bitcoin/bitcoin. This site is not affiliated with GitHub. Content is generated from a GitHub metadata backup.
generated: 2024-07-05 19:13 UTC

This site is hosted by @0xB10C
More mirrored repositories can be found on mirror.b10c.me