tests: Use BasicTestingSetup to initialise fuzzing environment #19074

1. 
   practicalswift commented at 8:58 pm on May 26, 2020: contributor

   Use BasicTestingSetup to initialise fuzzing environment (as suggested by MarcoFalke).

   Also: Remove unreachable fuzzing code. Various small coverage improvements.

   See doc/fuzzing.md for information on how to fuzz Bitcoin Core. Don’t forget to contribute any coverage increasing inputs you find to the Bitcoin Core fuzzing corpus repo.

   Happy fuzzing :)

2. DrahtBot added the label Tests on May 26, 2020
3. 
   practicalswift commented at 9:35 am on June 2, 2020: contributor

   Added commit: “tests: Avoid fuzzer-specific nullptr dereference in libevent when handling PROXY requests”.
4. 
   MarcoFalke commented at 11:16 am on June 2, 2020: member

   That commit seems unrelated. Mind splitting it up so that the libevent reviewers can review it?
5. practicalswift force-pushed on Jun 2, 2020
6. 
   practicalswift commented at 11:57 am on June 2, 2020: contributor

   @MarcoFalke Done!
7. DrahtBot added the label Needs rebase on Jun 8, 2020
8. practicalswift force-pushed on Jun 8, 2020
9. DrahtBot removed the label Needs rebase on Jun 8, 2020
10. 
    DrahtBot commented at 2:02 am on June 9, 2020: member

    The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.

    Conflicts

    No conflicts as of last run.

11. DrahtBot added the label Needs rebase on Jun 11, 2020
12. practicalswift force-pushed on Jun 11, 2020
13. DrahtBot removed the label Needs rebase on Jun 11, 2020
14. MarcoFalke referenced this in commit 505b4eda55 on Jul 10, 2020
15. DrahtBot added the label Needs rebase on Jul 11, 2020
16. tests: Use BasicTestingSetup to initialize fuzzing environment 096c69caf7
17. tests: Remove unreachable fuzzing code. Various small coverage improvements. ae05f0dfea
18. tests: Add InitializeFuzzingContext() for easy initialization of fuzzing context without debug logging (avoids writing to disk) e2b85985d2
19. practicalswift force-pushed on Jul 11, 2020
20. sidhujag referenced this in commit 8c57f3df6f on Jul 11, 2020
21. DrahtBot removed the label Needs rebase on Jul 11, 2020
22. 
    practicalswift commented at 2:01 pm on August 11, 2020: contributor

    @MarcoFalke I think you requested something along the lines of this PR at one time: do we want to proceed with this or should I close? :)
23. practicalswift closed this on Aug 26, 2020

    ---

24. practicalswift deleted the branch on Apr 10, 2021
25. PastaPastaPasta referenced this in commit e008b546e3 on Jul 17, 2022
26. DrahtBot locked this on Aug 18, 2022

Contributors
practicalswift MarcoFalke DrahtBot

Labels
Tests