Refactor: clean up PeriodicFlush() #19085

pull jnewbery wants to merge 1 commits into bitcoin:master from jnewbery:2020-05-refactor-periodic-flush changing 1 files +22 βˆ’31
  1. jnewbery commented at 3:01 am on May 28, 2020: member
    PeriodicFlush() is much more convoluted than it needs to be: it has triple nesting, local variables counting refs and return values, and increments the mapFileUseCount iterator unnecessarily. Removing all of that makes the function much easier to understand.
  2. jnewbery requested review from MarcoFalke on May 28, 2020
  3. fanquake added the label Refactoring on May 28, 2020
  4. DrahtBot commented at 4:57 am on May 28, 2020: member

    The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.

    Conflicts

    Reviewers, this pull request conflicts with the following ones:

    • #19335 (wallet: Cleanup and separate BerkeleyDatabase and BerkeleyBatch by achow101)
    • #19334 (wallet: Introduce WalletDatabase abstract class by achow101)
    • #19325 (wallet: Refactor BerkeleyDatabase to introduce DatabaseBatch abstract class by achow101)
    • #19324 (wallet: Move BerkeleyBatch static functions to BerkeleyDatabase by achow101)
    • #19137 (wallettool: Add dump and createfromdump commands by achow101)
    • #19102 (wallet: Introduce and use DummyDatabase instead of dummy BerkeleyDatabase by achow101)
    • #19077 (wallet: Add sqlite as an alternative wallet database and use it for new descriptor wallets by achow101)
    • #18904 (Don’t call lsn_reset in periodic flush by bvbfan)

    If you consider this pull request important, please also help to review the conflicting pull requests. Ideally, start with the one that should be merged first.

  5. MarcoFalke commented at 10:47 am on May 28, 2020: member
    Concept β’Άβ’Έβ“€
  6. fanquake commented at 8:27 am on June 4, 2020: member
    Glanced over 2495f8fa9992872f19c8c80180322d2deedd2b87 and it looks like an improvement. Can you rebase now that #18792 is in, and I’ll re-review. @achow101 you might also want to take a look here?
  7. jnewbery commented at 3:14 pm on June 4, 2020: member
    Thanks @fanquake . I’ve rebased on master.
  8. jnewbery force-pushed on Jun 4, 2020
  9. fanquake approved
  10. fanquake commented at 11:57 am on June 5, 2020: member

    ACK 9c031049be0a9b2fc9d8459adccdb56f28169ac0 - Thanks for the quick follow up. This is a nice simplification, and it’d seem that functions like BerkeleyDatabase::Backup or BerkeleyEnvironment::Flush could receive similar refactors.

    There was one behaviour I noticed while reviewing (unchanged by this PR), which I’ve opened an issue for in #19175.

  11. DrahtBot added the label Needs rebase on Jun 17, 2020
  12. jnewbery commented at 6:41 pm on June 23, 2020: member
    Rebased
  13. jnewbery force-pushed on Jun 23, 2020
  14. DrahtBot removed the label Needs rebase on Jun 23, 2020
  15. in src/wallet/bdb.cpp:626 in 7c10020456 outdated
    656-            if (mi != env->mapFileUseCount.end())
    657-            {
    658-                LogPrint(BCLog::WALLETDB, "Flushing %s\n", strFile);
    659-                int64_t nStart = GetTimeMillis();
    660+    // Don't flush if any databases are in use
    661+    for (auto it = env->mapFileUseCount.begin() ; it != env->mapFileUseCount.end(); it++) {
    


    jonatack commented at 2:50 am on July 1, 2020:

    nit, while retouching this code, ++i is preferred over i++

    0    for (auto it = env->mapFileUseCount.begin() ; it != env->mapFileUseCount.end(); ++it) {
    

    jnewbery commented at 1:43 pm on July 1, 2020:
    It makes no difference to the compiled code since we’re not using the return value of the incrementer. I’ll change to ++it if I have to retouch this branch, but otherwise it’s not worth invalidating ACKs.

    promag commented at 9:55 am on July 9, 2020:
    nit, extra space after begin. Better, use range based loop.

    jnewbery commented at 10:40 am on July 9, 2020:
    Yes. Even better. Will change if I have to retouch.
  16. in src/wallet/bdb.cpp:640 in 7c10020456 outdated
    679+    int64_t nStart = GetTimeMillis();
    680+
    681+    // Flush wallet file so it's self contained
    682+    env->CloseDb(strFile);
    683+    env->CheckpointLSN(strFile);
    684+    env->mapFileUseCount.erase(it);
    


    jonatack commented at 2:52 am on July 1, 2020:
    Sanity check: Does this erase the same element as the previous version? env->mapFileUseCount.erase(mi++);

    jnewbery commented at 1:41 pm on July 1, 2020:
    Yes. The post-incrementer returns (a copy of) the value before incrementing https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/operator_incdec
  17. in src/wallet/bdb.cpp:637 in 7c10020456 outdated
    676-        }
    677-    }
    678+    LogPrint(BCLog::WALLETDB, "Flushing %s\n", strFile);
    679+    int64_t nStart = GetTimeMillis();
    680+
    681+    // Flush wallet file so it's self contained
    


    jonatack commented at 2:54 am on July 1, 2020:
    nit: self-contained

    jnewbery commented at 1:43 pm on July 1, 2020:
    Will change if I need to retouch
  18. jonatack commented at 3:02 am on July 1, 2020: member
    ACK 9c031049be0a9b2fc9d8459adccdb56f28169ac0 nice refactoring
  19. jonatack commented at 3:04 am on July 1, 2020: member
    Note to reviewers: I suggest looking at the diff with space changes ignored (git show -w).
  20. DrahtBot added the label Needs rebase on Jul 5, 2020
  21. refactor: clean up PeriodicFlush() e846a2a1d9
  22. jnewbery commented at 6:07 am on July 9, 2020: member
    rebased
  23. jnewbery force-pushed on Jul 9, 2020
  24. jonatack approved
  25. jonatack commented at 7:18 am on July 9, 2020: member
    re-ACK e846a2a per git range-diff f7c19e8 7c10020 e846a2a
  26. DrahtBot removed the label Needs rebase on Jul 9, 2020
  27. MarcoFalke commented at 9:45 am on July 9, 2020: member

    ACK e846a2a1d9e8aa37abfa55bd4d2a0a9f55ba6c8e 🎁

    Signature:

     0-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
     1Hash: SHA512
     2
     3ACK e846a2a1d9e8aa37abfa55bd4d2a0a9f55ba6c8e 🎁
     4-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
     5
     6iQGzBAEBCgAdFiEE+rVPoUahrI9sLGYTzit1aX5ppUgFAlwqrYAACgkQzit1aX5p
     7pUgG+wv/SWkvdinhfmWvllvmoyHz6TKFcTwBBsvJFneg6saYLV/A21hlxGfD+iS8
     8xu5f03nFpFsb+bFQvRcm2FtG1McxQTnmEcnNUss0MZ53F8uNCoIG5kfM1eAfBXuw
     9omRgHgMAk2NMZmCUrHT2Qv4ZOKwUZ2N/4TiVvc2apXy6Zbgf0NKxqagGKs7yRXKN
    10arajJLM8ua6ewKQFZtPZySRvH03Ed33im0vpae/nsSmluqtJ3VnzVhoCGuxybKzT
    11RpbBtjD4ayMC/O8q2E93+VHao/zB/CIEpess1KEWIkyyT7w/JZ86XYiVWcEPdfkD
    12yHUPoPTMOhJuPe/1Vvx9sMxoSV07c/aAgodFDP/UHHaT1JIPfZwyMHWmXcx5pIZd
    13V9qIdH2uk2mBEp57o5HcJlA/57y4gtDd32WGo23mo/Ef1kqMKwjBs/o2YnE0/f+e
    14eoCn9pDih3lnbxg919suNbfCtLpVQAlqHVXMe5XafrYDLSQtXGBkfCk33CTSTEGL
    158AJuiXGE
    16=0P36
    17-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
    

    Timestamp of file with hash d38062803983ae335282eeba787d6c83aeeabfe3699adc77650b02de45c422fc -

  28. MarcoFalke commented at 9:45 am on July 9, 2020: member
    cc @achow101 any objections to this?
  29. promag commented at 10:01 am on July 9, 2020: member
    ACK e846a2a1d9e8aa37abfa55bd4d2a0a9f55ba6c8e.
  30. jnewbery commented at 10:40 am on July 9, 2020: member
    I think this is ready for merge. It’s a simple refactor and has 3 ACKs now.
  31. MarcoFalke merged this on Jul 9, 2020
  32. MarcoFalke closed this on Jul 9, 2020

  33. MarcoFalke commented at 11:09 am on July 9, 2020: member
    Went ahead to merge this and postponed to fix the nits in a related pull that had less ACKs (#18923)
  34. jnewbery deleted the branch on Jul 10, 2020
  35. Fabcien referenced this in commit 24a9346645 on Dec 7, 2020
  36. DrahtBot locked this on Feb 15, 2022

github-metadata-mirror

This is a metadata mirror of the GitHub repository bitcoin/bitcoin. This site is not affiliated with GitHub. Content is generated from a GitHub metadata backup.
generated: 2024-11-17 09:12 UTC

This site is hosted by @0xB10C
More mirrored repositories can be found on mirror.b10c.me