p2p: Treat handshake misbehavior like unknown message #20079

pull MarcoFalke wants to merge 2 commits into bitcoin:master from MarcoFalke:2010-p2pNoVersion changing 4 files +17 −25
  1. MarcoFalke commented at 3:24 pm on October 4, 2020: member
    Handshake misbehaviour doesn’t cost us more than any other unknown message, so it seems odd to treat it differently
  2. MarcoFalke force-pushed on Oct 4, 2020
  3. DrahtBot added the label P2P on Oct 4, 2020
  4. practicalswift commented at 7:33 pm on October 4, 2020: contributor
    Concept ACK
  5. MarcoFalke force-pushed on Oct 5, 2020
  6. MarcoFalke renamed this:
    p2p: Ignore non-version msgs before version msg
    p2p: Treat handshake misbehavior like unkown message
    on Oct 5, 2020
  7. hebasto commented at 2:01 pm on October 6, 2020: member
    Concept ACK.
  8. luke-jr commented at 6:09 pm on October 24, 2020: member

    Concept ACK on ignoring non-version messages prior to version, but I think ignoring the Nth version message is wrong.

    Since we don’t support actually changing to a new version, disconnecting is the polite reaction. (Probably doesn’t need to punish the node, though.)

  9. jnewbery renamed this:
    p2p: Treat handshake misbehavior like unkown message
    p2p: Treat handshake misbehavior like unknown message
    on Nov 13, 2020
  10. in src/net_processing.cpp:2368 in fac8e9ac71 outdated
    2365@@ -2366,7 +2366,7 @@ void PeerManager::ProcessMessage(CNode& pfrom, const std::string& msg_type, CDat
    2366         // Each connection can only send one version message
    2367         if (pfrom.nVersion != 0)
    2368         {
    


    jnewbery commented at 12:39 pm on November 17, 2020:

    Only if you retouch the branch:

    0        if (pfrom.nVersion != 0) {
    1            // Each connection can only send one version message
    

    MarcoFalke commented at 6:33 pm on November 18, 2020:
    My preference would be to remove the comment, because the logprint is already clear enough

    MarcoFalke commented at 8:10 am on November 19, 2020:
    Thx, fixed.
  11. in test/functional/p2p_invalid_messages.py:101 in fac8e9ac71 outdated
    78@@ -77,6 +79,13 @@ def test_buffer(self):
    79         conn.sync_with_ping(timeout=1)
    80         self.nodes[0].disconnect_p2ps()
    81 
    82+    def test_duplicate_version_msg(self):
    83+        self.log.info("Test duplicate version message is ignored")
    84+        conn = self.nodes[0].add_p2p_connection(P2PDataStore())
    85+        with self.nodes[0].assert_debug_log(['redundant version message from peer']):
    86+            conn.send_and_ping(msg_version())
    


    jnewbery commented at 12:42 pm on November 17, 2020:
    I think it’s much better to test the behaviour rather than the log. Here, that would be sending the message and then verifying that the peer is still connected (you could even check that getpeerinfo.banscore = 0, but that also seems a bit too implementation specific).

    MarcoFalke commented at 6:32 pm on November 18, 2020:
    The _and_ping part will take care of asserting that the connection is still up, no?

    jnewbery commented at 10:08 pm on November 18, 2020:
    Yes, I think that would do it, which makes asserting on the log redundant.

    MarcoFalke commented at 7:02 am on November 19, 2020:

    I like the assert log for two reasons:

    • I can call git grep -W 'redundant version message' and see the code as well as the test without searching manually
    • It protects against test mistakes, such as sending a verion msg, which would also be ignored

    jnewbery commented at 10:41 am on November 19, 2020:
    ok
  12. jnewbery commented at 12:43 pm on November 17, 2020: member

    utACK fac8e9ac7177bd2dee6b0532fde917aa4b89f651

    Couple of small style suggestions inline.

  13. amitiuttarwar added the label Review club on Nov 17, 2020
  14. amitiuttarwar commented at 6:03 pm on November 18, 2020: contributor
    light code review ACK fac8e9ac7177bd2dee6b0532fde917aa4b89f651
  15. MarcoFalke commented at 6:35 pm on November 18, 2020: member

    I think ignoring the Nth version message is wrong. Since we don’t support actually changing to a new version, disconnecting is the polite reaction

    If a previous released version of Core received two version messages, it would ignore them, so this pull is the least change from previous behaviour.

  16. p2p: Ignore non-version msgs before version msg
    Sending a non-version message before the initial version message is peer
    misbehavior. Though, it seems arbitrary and confusing to disconnect only
    after exactly 100 non-version messages. So remove the Misbehaving and
    instead rely on the existing disconnect-due-to-handshake-timeout logic.
    fad68afcff
  17. p2p: Ignore version msgs after initial version msg
    Sending a version message after the intial version message is peer
    misbehavior. Though, it seems arbitrary and confusing to disconnect only
    after exactly 100 version messages. Duplicate version messages affect us
    no different than any other unknown message. So remove the Misbehaving
    and ignore the redundant msgs.
    faaad1bbac
  18. MarcoFalke force-pushed on Nov 19, 2020
  19. jnewbery commented at 10:39 am on November 19, 2020: member
    utACK faaad1bbac46cfeb22654b4c59f0aac7a680c03a
  20. practicalswift commented at 10:56 am on November 19, 2020: contributor
    ACK faaad1bbac46cfeb22654b4c59f0aac7a680c03a: patch looks correct
  21. DrahtBot commented at 4:41 am on November 29, 2020: member

    The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.

    Conflicts

    Reviewers, this pull request conflicts with the following ones:

    • #20524 (test: Move MIN_VERSION_SUPPORTED to p2p.py by jnewbery)
    • #20411 (test: Fix Version Message Deserialization Discrepancy by troygiorshev)

    If you consider this pull request important, please also help to review the conflicting pull requests. Ideally, start with the one that should be merged first.

  22. MarcoFalke merged this on Dec 12, 2020
  23. MarcoFalke closed this on Dec 12, 2020

  24. MarcoFalke deleted the branch on Dec 12, 2020
  25. sidhujag referenced this in commit 6a9cbeee69 on Dec 13, 2020
  26. DrahtBot locked this on Feb 15, 2022

github-metadata-mirror

This is a metadata mirror of the GitHub repository bitcoin/bitcoin. This site is not affiliated with GitHub. Content is generated from a GitHub metadata backup.
generated: 2024-11-21 09:12 UTC

This site is hosted by @0xB10C
More mirrored repositories can be found on mirror.b10c.me