ci, doc: Travis CI features and mentions cleanup #20691

pull hebasto wants to merge 2 commits into bitcoin:master from hebasto:201217-travis changing 10 files +7 −61
  1. hebasto commented at 8:06 pm on December 17, 2020: member

    As Travis CI is no longer used, this PR:

    • drops travis_fold feature
    • drops mentions of Travis CI in docs
  2. ci: Drop travis_fold feature as Travis CI is no longer used 09d105ef0f
  3. in doc/release-process.md:310 in 4f286f8762 outdated
    306@@ -307,9 +307,9 @@ bitcoin.org (see below for bitcoin.org update instructions).
    307   - First, check to see if the Bitcoin.org maintainers have prepared a
    308     release: https://github.com/bitcoin-dot-org/bitcoin.org/labels/Core
    309 
    310-      - If they have, it will have previously failed their Travis CI
    311+      - If they have, it will have previously failed their Cirrus CI
    


    MarcoFalke commented at 8:18 pm on December 17, 2020:

    bitcoin(core).org is still using Travis

    0      - If they have, it will have previously failed their CI
    

    hebasto commented at 11:23 pm on December 17, 2020:
  4. in test/functional/README.md:26 in 4f286f8762 outdated
    22@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ don't have test cases for.
    23 - The oldest supported Python version is specified in [doc/dependencies.md](/doc/dependencies.md).
    24   Consider using [pyenv](https://github.com/pyenv/pyenv), which checks [.python-version](/.python-version),
    25   to prevent accidentally introducing modern syntax from an unsupported Python version.
    26-  The Travis linter also checks this, but [possibly not in all cases](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/14884#discussion_r239585126).
    27+  The Cirrus CI linter job also checks this, but [possibly not in all cases](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/14884#discussion_r239585126).
    


    MarcoFalke commented at 8:19 pm on December 17, 2020:

    no need to be overly specific

    0  The CI linter job also checks this, but [possibly not in all cases](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/14884#discussion_r239585126).
    

    hebasto commented at 11:23 pm on December 17, 2020:
  5. MarcoFalke commented at 8:20 pm on December 17, 2020: member
    Might be better to just say CI, which can’t be wrong
  6. in doc/developer-notes.md:546 in 4f286f8762 outdated
    542@@ -543,7 +543,7 @@ General Bitcoin Core
    543   - *Rationale*: RPC allows for better automatic testing. The test suite for
    544     the GUI is very limited.
    545 
    546-- Make sure pull requests pass Travis CI before merging.
    547+- Make sure pull requests pass Cirrus CI before merging.
    


    jonatack commented at 8:32 pm on December 17, 2020:
    0- Make sure pull requests pass CI before merging.
    

    hebasto commented at 11:23 pm on December 17, 2020:
  7. jonatack commented at 8:35 pm on December 17, 2020: member
    Concept ACK. I think you can just say CI instead of Cirrus CI everywhere you change here for less churn and maintenance. People see the CI sources in the PRs anyway. Maybe in one or two of the more official places you could optionally write CI (Continuous Integration) instead of just CI.
  8. DrahtBot added the label Docs on Dec 17, 2020
  9. DrahtBot added the label Tests on Dec 17, 2020
  10. doc: Drop mentions of Travis CI as it is no longer used 95487b0553
  11. hebasto force-pushed on Dec 17, 2020
  12. hebasto commented at 11:22 pm on December 17, 2020: member

    Updated 4f286f8762e49d2a31653dbfdba80fb300b06ba4 -> 95487b055328b590ba83f258de9637ab0f9a2f17 (pr20691.01 -> pr20691.02, diff):

  13. MarcoFalke commented at 6:22 am on December 18, 2020: member
    ACK 95487b055328b590ba83f258de9637ab0f9a2f17
  14. DrahtBot commented at 6:27 am on December 18, 2020: member

    The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.

    Conflicts

    Reviewers, this pull request conflicts with the following ones:

    • #20682 (ci: Install missing lint packages by MarcoFalke)

    If you consider this pull request important, please also help to review the conflicting pull requests. Ideally, start with the one that should be merged first.

  15. MarcoFalke merged this on Dec 18, 2020
  16. MarcoFalke closed this on Dec 18, 2020

  17. hebasto deleted the branch on Dec 18, 2020
  18. sidhujag referenced this in commit 0d39448c01 on Dec 18, 2020
  19. fanquake locked this on Dec 29, 2020

github-metadata-mirror

This is a metadata mirror of the GitHub repository bitcoin/bitcoin. This site is not affiliated with GitHub. Content is generated from a GitHub metadata backup.
generated: 2024-11-17 00:12 UTC

This site is hosted by @0xB10C
More mirrored repositories can be found on mirror.b10c.me