build: Fix "ERR: Unsigned tarballs do not exist" #24733

1. 
   hebasto commented at 8:29 AM on April 1, 2022: member

   This was missed in 53dd6165b8994301d638298906b006032e0bbe48 (bitcoin/bitcoin#24549).

2. build: Fix "ERR: Unsigned tarballs do not exist" 7762c5683f
3. fanquake added the label Build system on Apr 1, 2022
4. fanquake added this to the milestone 23.0 on Apr 1, 2022
5. fanquake added the label Needs backport (23.x) on Apr 1, 2022
6. fanquake approved
7. 
   fanquake commented at 8:32 AM on April 1, 2022: member

   ACK 7762c5683f91a066cf833a19e7c0153942395cb1 - this should have been a part of #24549.

8. 
   laanwj commented at 9:15 AM on April 1, 2022: member

   ACK 7762c5683f91a066cf833a19e7c0153942395cb1 Needed to make exactly this change before the codesign attachment worked.

9. laanwj merged this on Apr 1, 2022
10. laanwj closed this on Apr 1, 2022

    ---

11. hebasto deleted the branch on Apr 1, 2022
12. 
    Sjors commented at 11:28 AM on April 1, 2022: member

    I ran into the same error. Can I just apply this patch and continue guix-attest, or do we need a new RC?

13. 
    Sjors commented at 11:30 AM on April 1, 2022: member

    I guess not, because guix will think I'm trying to build a random commit instead of a release. Anyway, this would confuse too many other signers.

14. 
    guggero commented at 4:08 PM on April 1, 2022: contributor

    Applying this patch after building the binaries but before code signing worked for me.

15. 
    Sjors commented at 4:30 PM on April 1, 2022: member

    Not for me, ./contrib/guix/guix-codesign triggered it.

16. sidhujag referenced this in commit cdab9c6e51 on Apr 3, 2022
17. fanquake referenced this in commit 39396ab593 on Apr 4, 2022
18. 
    fanquake commented at 9:55 AM on April 4, 2022: member

    Being backported in #24755.

19. fanquake removed the label Needs backport (23.x) on Apr 4, 2022
20. MarcoFalke referenced this in commit 1ea76767d0 on Apr 5, 2022
21. DrahtBot locked this on Apr 4, 2023

Milestone
23.0