Net processing: follow ups to #20799 (removing support for v1 compact blocks) #25147

pull jnewbery wants to merge 2 commits into bitcoin:master from jnewbery:20205_20799_follow_ups changing 5 files +11 −13
  1. jnewbery commented at 5:54 pm on May 16, 2022: member

    This implements two of the suggestions from code reviews of PR 20799:

    • Remove fUseWTXID parameter from CBlockHeaderAndShortTxIDs constructor
    • Remove segwit argument from build_block_on_tip()
  2. jnewbery commented at 5:54 pm on May 16, 2022: member
  3. DrahtBot added the label P2P on May 16, 2022
  4. in src/net_processing.cpp:1981 in 3ab9f69e2a outdated
    1977@@ -1978,7 +1978,7 @@ void PeerManagerImpl::ProcessGetBlockData(CNode& pfrom, Peer& peer, const CInv&
    1978                 if (a_recent_compact_block && a_recent_compact_block->header.GetHash() == pindex->GetBlockHash()) {
    1979                     m_connman.PushMessage(&pfrom, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::CMPCTBLOCK, *a_recent_compact_block));
    1980                 } else {
    1981-                    CBlockHeaderAndShortTxIDs cmpctblock(*pblock, true);
    1982+                    CBlockHeaderAndShortTxIDs cmpctblock(*pblock);
    


    MarcoFalke commented at 6:31 am on May 17, 2022:
    0                    CBlockHeaderAndShortTxIDs cmpctblock{*pblock};
    

    nit: {}


    jnewbery commented at 9:41 am on May 17, 2022:
    Done (here and all other lines I touched)
  5. in src/net_processing.cpp:1635 in 3ab9f69e2a outdated
    1631@@ -1632,7 +1632,7 @@ void PeerManagerImpl::BlockDisconnected(const std::shared_ptr<const CBlock> &blo
    1632  */
    1633 void PeerManagerImpl::NewPoWValidBlock(const CBlockIndex *pindex, const std::shared_ptr<const CBlock>& pblock)
    1634 {
    1635-    std::shared_ptr<const CBlockHeaderAndShortTxIDs> pcmpctblock = std::make_shared<const CBlockHeaderAndShortTxIDs> (*pblock, true);
    1636+    std::shared_ptr<const CBlockHeaderAndShortTxIDs> pcmpctblock = std::make_shared<const CBlockHeaderAndShortTxIDs> (*pblock);
    


    MarcoFalke commented at 6:31 am on May 17, 2022:
    0    std::shared_ptr<const CBlockHeaderAndShortTxIDs> pcmpctblock = std::make_shared<const CBlockHeaderAndShortTxIDs>(*pblock);
    

    nit: space


    MarcoFalke commented at 6:36 am on May 17, 2022:
    0    auto pcmpctblock{std::make_shared<const CBlockHeaderAndShortTxIDs>(*pblock)};
    

    nit: Or maybe even use auto :sweat_smile:


    MarcoFalke commented at 7:55 am on May 17, 2022:
    nit: Or maybe even inline into lazy_ser to avoid constructing it when there is no need to. (Might minimally speed up IBD?)

    jnewbery commented at 9:41 am on May 17, 2022:
    Removed space

    jnewbery commented at 9:42 am on May 17, 2022:

    I’ve changed to auto.

    Or maybe even inline into lazy_ser to avoid constructing it when there is no need to. (Might minimally speed up IBD?)

    I’m not sure how this would work. pcmpctblock is required further down the function outside the lazy_ser lambda. I have moved the instantiation below the early exits, which I think addresses your point about speeding up IBD.


    MarcoFalke commented at 9:48 am on May 17, 2022:
    Yeah, I missed that assignment. Seems fine to just move it down for now.
  6. MarcoFalke approved
  7. MarcoFalke commented at 6:32 am on May 17, 2022: member
    lgtm
  8. MarcoFalke added the label Refactoring on May 17, 2022
  9. naumenkogs commented at 7:38 am on May 17, 2022: member
    Concept ACK. I will give a full ACK once you resolve Marko’s suggestions, which I endorse too.
  10. Remove fUseWTXID parameter from CBlockHeaderAndShortTxIDs constructor
    All uses of CBlockHeaderAndShortTxIDs in the product code are
    constructed with fUseWTXID=true, so remove the parameter.
    
    There is one use of the CBlockHeaderAndShortTxIDs constructor with
    fUseWTXID=false in the unit tests. This is used to construct a
    CBlockHeaderAndShortTxIDs for a block with only the coinbase
    transaction, so setting fUseWTXID to true or false makes no difference.
    
    Suggested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20799#pullrequestreview-963480278
    c65bf50b44
  11. jnewbery referenced this in commit a2e357e3dc on May 17, 2022
  12. jnewbery force-pushed on May 17, 2022
  13. jnewbery commented at 9:44 am on May 17, 2022: member
    Thanks for the review @MarcoFalke and @naumenkogs. I’ve addressed all your comments.
  14. in src/net_processing.cpp:1645 in 97e4a5d7dc outdated
    1639@@ -1643,10 +1640,11 @@ void PeerManagerImpl::NewPoWValidBlock(const CBlockIndex *pindex, const std::sha
    1640 
    1641     if (!DeploymentActiveAt(*pindex, m_chainman, Consensus::DEPLOYMENT_SEGWIT)) return;
    1642 
    1643-    uint256 hashBlock(pblock->GetHash());
    1644+    auto pcmpctblock = std::make_shared<const CBlockHeaderAndShortTxIDs>(*pblock);
    1645     const std::shared_future<CSerializedNetMsg> lazy_ser{
    1646-        std::async(std::launch::deferred, [&] { return msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::CMPCTBLOCK, *pcmpctblock); })};
    1647+        std::async(std::launch::deferred, [&] { return CNetMsgMaker(PROTOCOL_VERSION).Make(NetMsgType::CMPCTBLOCK, *pcmpctblock); })};
    


    MarcoFalke commented at 9:46 am on May 17, 2022:
    0        std::async(std::launch::deferred, [&] { return CNetMsgMaker{PROTOCOL_VERSION}.Make(NetMsgType::CMPCTBLOCK, *pcmpctblock); })};
    

    nit


    jnewbery commented at 9:56 am on May 17, 2022:
    Done
  15. in src/net_processing.cpp:1647 in 97e4a5d7dc outdated
    1644+    auto pcmpctblock = std::make_shared<const CBlockHeaderAndShortTxIDs>(*pblock);
    1645     const std::shared_future<CSerializedNetMsg> lazy_ser{
    1646-        std::async(std::launch::deferred, [&] { return msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::CMPCTBLOCK, *pcmpctblock); })};
    1647+        std::async(std::launch::deferred, [&] { return CNetMsgMaker(PROTOCOL_VERSION).Make(NetMsgType::CMPCTBLOCK, *pcmpctblock); })};
    1648 
    1649+    uint256 hashBlock{pblock->GetHash()};
    


    MarcoFalke commented at 9:47 am on May 17, 2022:
    I think it is fine to leave untouched lines as-is.

    jnewbery commented at 9:57 am on May 17, 2022:
    I moved this variable assignment down to where it’s first used, so it’s not untouched.
  16. MarcoFalke approved
  17. MarcoFalke commented at 9:48 am on May 17, 2022: member
    still lgtm
  18. jnewbery referenced this in commit 40ae310795 on May 17, 2022
  19. jnewbery force-pushed on May 17, 2022
  20. naumenkogs commented at 8:03 am on May 18, 2022: member
    ACK 8184dcbdd18d8b732dc285a05884ecda115062e1
  21. fanquake requested review from dergoegge on May 18, 2022
  22. [test] Remove segwit argument from build_block_on_tip()
    The only place that segwit=True is for a block that contains only the
    coinbase transaction. Since the witness commitment is optional if none
    of the transactions have a witness, we can leave it out. This doesn't
    change the test coverage, which is testing p2p compact block logic.
    
    Suggested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20799#discussion_r867782119
    bf6526f4a0
  23. in src/net_processing.cpp:1643 in 8184dcbdd1 outdated
    1639@@ -1643,10 +1640,11 @@ void PeerManagerImpl::NewPoWValidBlock(const CBlockIndex *pindex, const std::sha
    1640 
    1641     if (!DeploymentActiveAt(*pindex, m_chainman, Consensus::DEPLOYMENT_SEGWIT)) return;
    1642 
    1643-    uint256 hashBlock(pblock->GetHash());
    1644+    auto pcmpctblock = std::make_shared<const CBlockHeaderAndShortTxIDs>(*pblock);
    


    dergoegge commented at 10:09 am on May 18, 2022:
    It looks like we don’t call NewPoWValidBlock while we are in IBD (see here), so 40ae3107956e2425c4a3cf0cb3a4a2d6d952894c won’t really affect IBD speed. Consider dropping that commit or changing the commit message if there is another motivation for the change.

    jnewbery commented at 12:48 pm on May 18, 2022:
    Good catch! I’ve dropped the commit (this function could be tidied up a bit in terms of commenting/variable instantiation, but that doesn’t seem strictly related to this PR).
  24. jnewbery force-pushed on May 18, 2022
  25. dergoegge commented at 1:47 pm on May 18, 2022: member
    Code review ACK bf6526f4a0ab30f77952ecdee90cd77dd9ba06f6
  26. fanquake requested review from naumenkogs on May 18, 2022
  27. naumenkogs commented at 6:14 am on May 19, 2022: member
    ACK bf6526f4a0ab30f77952ecdee90cd77dd9ba06f6
  28. fanquake merged this on May 19, 2022
  29. fanquake closed this on May 19, 2022

  30. jnewbery deleted the branch on May 19, 2022
  31. sidhujag referenced this in commit 44c0a043a9 on May 28, 2022
  32. DrahtBot locked this on May 19, 2023

github-metadata-mirror

This is a metadata mirror of the GitHub repository bitcoin/bitcoin. This site is not affiliated with GitHub. Content is generated from a GitHub metadata backup.
generated: 2024-11-17 18:12 UTC

This site is hosted by @0xB10C
More mirrored repositories can be found on mirror.b10c.me