no test coverage for -datacarrier and -datacarriersize #25787

1. 
   glozow commented at 2:22 pm on August 5, 2022: member

   The -datacarrier and -datacarriersize options were added in #3715 and #5077. Seems like those PRs did not add tests and we still don’t have tests for them…? It should be easier to test things like this now with functional tests. I see -datacarriersize used in some places to create large transactions by stuffing outputs with lots of data but that’s not very thorough. We should probably add a functional test that checks these options do what they’re supposed to.
2. glozow added the label Tests on Aug 5, 2022
3. glozow added the label good first issue on Aug 5, 2022
4. 
   w0xlt commented at 6:08 am on August 6, 2022: contributor

   #25792 proposes a test implementation.
5. MarcoFalke closed this on Aug 11, 2022

   ---

6. sidhujag referenced this in commit 0860e44a43 on Aug 11, 2022
7. bitcoin locked this on Aug 11, 2023

Contributors
glozow w0xlt

Labels
Tests good first issue