The -datacarrier and -datacarriersize options were added in #3715 and #5077. Seems like those PRs did not add tests and we still don't have tests for them...? It should be easier to test things like this now with functional tests. I see -datacarriersize used in some places to create large transactions by stuffing outputs with lots of data but that's not very thorough. We should probably add a functional test that checks these options do what they're supposed to.
no test coverage for -datacarrier and -datacarriersize #25787
issue glozow opened this issue on August 5, 2022-
glozow commented at 2:22 PM on August 5, 2022: member
- glozow added the label Tests on Aug 5, 2022
- glozow added the label good first issue on Aug 5, 2022
-
- MarcoFalke closed this on Aug 11, 2022
- sidhujag referenced this in commit 0860e44a43 on Aug 11, 2022
- bitcoin locked this on Aug 11, 2023
Labels