interpreter: split PrecomputedTransactionData::Init() or rename force #27152

1. 
   fanquake commented at 9:33 am on February 24, 2023: member

   Potential followup from #27122#pullrequestreview-1307630323:

   I do wonder if it makes sense to rename force to something like signing_context or even more drastically split Init up into two obvious types ConsensusInit/SigningInit to make things clearer to future readers.

   Seems like there might also be scope to make some of the Init() inline commentary clearer, given other review comments in #27122.

   cc @instagibbs @ajtowns @roconnor-blockstream. If there is agreement on doing this, lets open a change, otherwise we can close this issue.

2. fanquake added the label Brainstorming on Feb 24, 2023
3. fanquake added the label Consensus on Feb 24, 2023
4. 
   instagibbs commented at 2:29 pm on February 24, 2023: member

   I obviously agree with myself, will let others chime in
5. fanquake deleted a comment on Feb 25, 2023

Contributors
fanquake instagibbs

Labels
Brainstorming Consensus