Failure running CI locally: "#0 15.01 Error: Unable to find a match: glibc-devel.x86_64 libstdc++-devel.x86_64 glibc-devel.i686 libstdc++-devel.i686"

pinheadmz commented at 4:07 pm on June 17, 2023: member

Is there an existing issue for this?

I have searched the existing issues

Current behaviour

I’m following the guide in ci/README.md but I can’t get any of the environments to run successfully.

Expected behaviour

Run CI locally

Steps to reproduce

macOS:

0--> docker -v
1Docker version 24.0.2, build cb74dfc
2--> uname -a
3Darwin   21.6.0 Darwin Kernel Version 21.6.0: Thu Mar  9 20:10:19 PST 2023; root:xnu-8020.240.18.700.8~1/RELEASE_ARM64_T8101 arm64

command: FILE_ENV="./ci/test/00_setup_env_i686_centos.sh" ./ci/test_run_all.sh

Relevant log output

Full log: https://gist.github.com/pinheadmz/912bbb8dc55bc9e95ca8dda660f3800b

end of log:

0[#0](/bitcoin-bitcoin/0/) 7.735 + bash -c 'dnf -y --allowerasing install gcc-c++ glibc-devel.x86_64 libstdc++-devel.x86_64 glibc-devel.i686 libstdc++-devel.i686 ccache libtool make git python3 python3-pip which patch lbzip2 xz procps-ng dash rsync coreutils bison util-linux '
1[#0](/bitcoin-bitcoin/0/) 25.06 Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux 9 - aarch64 1.0 MB/s |  18 MB     00:17    
2[#0](/bitcoin-bitcoin/0/) 30.34 Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux 9 - Next -  448 kB/s | 606 kB     00:01    
3[#0](/bitcoin-bitcoin/0/) 30.75 Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:01 ago on Sat Jun 17 16:06:48 2023.
4[#0](/bitcoin-bitcoin/0/) 31.46 No match for argument: glibc-devel.x86_64
5[#0](/bitcoin-bitcoin/0/) 31.47 No match for argument: libstdc++-devel.x86_64
6[#0](/bitcoin-bitcoin/0/) 31.47 No match for argument: glibc-devel.i686
7[#0](/bitcoin-bitcoin/0/) 31.48 No match for argument: libstdc++-devel.i686
8[#0](/bitcoin-bitcoin/0/) 31.48 Package python3-3.9.16-2.el9.aarch64 is already installed.
9[#0](/bitcoin-bitcoin/0/) 31.53 Error: Unable to find a match: glibc-devel.x86_64 libstdc++-devel.x86_64 glibc-devel.i686 libstdc++-devel.i686

How did you obtain Bitcoin Core

Compiled from source

What version of Bitcoin Core are you using?

master f0758d8a6696657269d9c057e7aa079ffa9e1c16

Operating system and version

macOS 12.6.5

Machine specifications

No response

pinheadmz commented at 4:23 pm on June 17, 2023: member

macos env failure:

--> FILE_ENV="./ci/test/00_setup_env_mac.sh" ./ci/test_run_all.sh

full log: https://gist.github.com/pinheadmz/cb57f51857812b9e78360648f5431c28

error:

02 warnings and 1 error generated.
1make[1]: *** [Makefile:1814: mut_pthread.o] Error 1
2make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
3make[1]: *** [Makefile:1514: bt_compare.o] Error 1
4In file included from ../dist/./../btree/bt_compress.c:9:
5In file included from ./db_int.h:884:
6In file included from ../dist/./../dbinc/mutex.h:15:
7../dist/./../dbinc/mutex_int.h:932:2: error: unknown type name 'pthread_rwlock_t'

pinheadmz commented at 5:33 pm on June 17, 2023: member

This one succeeded: --> FILE_ENV="./ci/test/00_setup_env_native_asan.sh" ./ci/test_run_all.sh

maflcko commented at 11:36 am on June 18, 2023: member

I don’t think you can cross-compile from aarch64 to i686, at least on CentOS. For now, I’d recommend to use a x86 machine.

maflcko added the label Tests on Jun 18, 2023

maflcko added the label Questions and Help on Jun 18, 2023

fanquake commented at 10:41 am on June 19, 2023: member

macos env failure: ../dist/./../dbinc/mutex_int.h:932:2: error: unknown type name ‘pthread_rwlock_t’

Does the change from #26073 fix this for you?

maflcko commented at 10:50 am on June 19, 2023: member

Does the change from #26073 fix this for you?

The changes are already merged and should already be included, no?

fanquake commented at 10:51 am on June 19, 2023: member

are already merged and should already be included, no?

They are only applied when building for *BSD

fanquake commented at 11:05 am on June 19, 2023: member

I don’t think you can cross-compile from aarch64 to i686, at least on CentOS. For now, I’d recommend to use a x86 machine.

Yea. CentOS doesn’t ship libstdc++-devel.x86_64/i686 or glibc-devel.i686/x86_64 packages for aarch64, so there’s nothing we can (easily) do here.

pinheadmz commented at 8:11 pm on June 19, 2023: member

I’d recommend to use a x86 machine.

Ok thanks, I’m having better luck on Ubuntu on x86 I’ll open a new issue if I run into problems there.

pinheadmz closed this on Jun 19, 2023

bitcoin locked this on Jun 18, 2024

Failure running CI locally: “#0 15.01 Error: Unable to find a match: glibc-devel.x86_64 libstdc++-devel.x86_64 glibc-devel.i686 libstdc++-devel.i686” #27910