The tip may have advanced, also if it did not, there is no reason to have two variables point to the same block.
Fixes #27596 (review)
The tip may have advanced, also if it did not, there is no reason to have two variables point to the same block.
Fixes #27596 (review)
The tip may have advanced, also if it did not, there is no reason to
have two variables point to the same block.
The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.
For detailed information about the code coverage, see the test coverage report.
See the guideline for information on the review process.
Type | Reviewers |
---|---|
ACK | pablomartin4btc, BrandonOdiwuor, achow101 |
Approach ACK | jamesob |
If your review is incorrectly listed, please react with 👎 to this comment and the bot will ignore it on the next update.
Should this be backported?
I don’t think assumeutxo params were specified for the main chain, and a wrong RPC result output in some test cases seems harmless.