refactor: use recommended type hiding on multi

theuni commented at 3:05 pm on May 29, 2024: member

This significantly reduces the size of the symbol name lengths that end up in the binaries as well as in compiler warnings/errors. Otherwise there should be no functional change.

Example before:

0000000000000000 W unsigned long boost::multi_index::detail::hashed_index<mempoolentry_txid, SaltedTxidHasher, std::equal_to, boost::multi_index::detail::nth_layer<1, CTxMemPoolEntry, boost::multi_index::indexed_by<boost::multi_index::hashed_unique<mempoolentry_txid, SaltedTxidHasher, mpl_::na, mpl_::na>, boost::multi_index::hashed_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<index_by_wtxid, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na>, mempoolentry_wtxid, SaltedTxidHasher, mpl_::na>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<descendant_score, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na>, boost::multi_index::identity, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByDescendantScore>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<entry_time, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na>, boost::multi_index::identity, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByEntryTime>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<ancestor_score, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na>, boost::multi_index::identity, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByAncestorFee>, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na>, std::allocator >, boost::mpl::vector0<mpl_::na>, boost::multi_index::detail::hashed_unique_tag>::count<uint256, SaltedTxidHasher, std::equal_to >(uint256 const&, SaltedTxidHasher const&, std::equal_to const&, mpl_::bool_) const

After:

0000000000000000 W unsigned long boost::multi_index::detail::hashed_index<mempoolentry_txid, SaltedTxidHasher, std::equal_to, boost::multi_index::detail::nth_layer<1, CTxMemPoolEntry, CTxMemPool::CTxMemPoolEntry_Indicies, std::allocator >, boost::mpl::vector0<mpl_::na>, boost::multi_index::detail::hashed_unique_tag>::count<uint256, SaltedTxidHasher, std::equal_to >(uint256 const&, SaltedTxidHasher const&, std::equal_to const&, mpl_::bool_) const

DrahtBot commented at 3:05 pm on May 29, 2024: contributor

The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.

Code Coverage

For detailed information about the code coverage, see the test coverage report.

Reviews

See the guideline for information on the review process.

Type	Reviewers
Concept ACK	TheCharlatan

If your review is incorrectly listed, please react with 👎 to this comment and the bot will ignore it on the next update.

Conflicts

Reviewers, this pull request conflicts with the following ones:

#28676 ([WIP] Cluster mempool implementation by sdaftuar)

If you consider this pull request important, please also help to review the conflicting pull requests. Ideally, start with the one that should be merged first.

DrahtBot added the label Refactoring on May 29, 2024

theuni commented at 3:08 pm on May 29, 2024: member

Note that I started by limiting BOOST_MULTI_INDEX_LIMIT_INDEXED_BY_SIZE and BOOST_MULTI_INDEX_LIMIT_TAG_SIZE as also recommended by the docs (which helped), but with the hiding applied with this commit those defines appear to be moot.

TheCharlatan commented at 3:57 pm on May 29, 2024: contributor

Concept ACK

fanquake commented at 4:16 pm on May 29, 2024: member

This significantly reduces the size of the symbol name lengths that end up in the binaries

About 23'000 bytes worth.

refactor: use recommended type hiding on multi_index types

Recommended by boost docs:
https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_85_0/libs/multi_index/doc/compiler_specifics.html#type_hiding

This significantly reduces the size of the symbol name lengths that end up in
the binaries as well as in compiler warnings/errors. Otherwise there should be
no functional change.

Example before:
0000000000000000 W unsigned long boost::multi_index::detail::hashed_index<mempoolentry_txid, SaltedTxidHasher, std::equal_to<uint256>, boost::multi_index::detail::nth_layer<1, CTxMemPoolEntry, boost::multi_index::indexed_by<boost::multi_index::hashed_unique<mempoolentry_txid, SaltedTxidHasher, mpl_::na, mpl_::na>, boost::multi_index::hashed_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<index_by_wtxid, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na>, mempoolentry_wtxid, SaltedTxidHasher, mpl_::na>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<descendant_score, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByDescendantScore>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<entry_time, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByEntryTime>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<ancestor_score, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByAncestorFee>, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na, mpl_::na>, std::allocator<CTxMemPoolEntry> >, boost::mpl::vector0<mpl_::na>, boost::multi_index::detail::hashed_unique_tag>::count<uint256, SaltedTxidHasher, std::equal_to<uint256> >(uint256 const&, SaltedTxidHasher const&, std::equal_to<uint256> const&, mpl_::bool_<false>) const

After:
0000000000000000 W unsigned long boost::multi_index::detail::hashed_index<mempoolentry_txid, SaltedTxidHasher, std::equal_to<uint256>, boost::multi_index::detail::nth_layer<1, CTxMemPoolEntry, CTxMemPool::CTxMemPoolEntry_Indicies, std::allocator<CTxMemPoolEntry> >, boost::mpl::vector0<mpl_::na>, boost::multi_index::detail::hashed_unique_tag>::count<uint256, SaltedTxidHasher, std::equal_to<uint256> >(uint256 const&, SaltedTxidHasher const&, std::equal_to<uint256> const&, mpl_::bool_<false>) const

a3cb309e7c

in src/node/miner.h:100 in a9b5ba43e8 outdated

 95@@ -96,21 +96,25 @@ struct CompareTxIterByAncestorCount {
 96     }
 97 };
 98 
 99+
100+struct CTxMemPoolModifiedEntry_Indicies final : boost::multi_index::indexed_by<

sipa commented at 8:24 pm on May 29, 2024:

indices?

theuni commented at 8:41 pm on May 29, 2024:

😬

theuni force-pushed on May 29, 2024

theuni force-pushed on May 31, 2024

theuni commented at 11:03 pm on May 31, 2024: member

Accidentally pushed a temp branch here, ignore the noise. Still ready for review.

refactor: use recommended type hiding on multi_index types #30194

Code Coverage

Reviews

Conflicts