Instead of constructing a new class every time a file operation is done, construct them once for each of the undo and block file when a new BlockManager is created.
In future, this might make it easier to introduce an abstract block store.
Historically, this was not easily possible prior to #27125.
Instead of constructing a new class every time a file operation is done,
construct them once for each of the undo and block file when a new
BlockManager is created.
In future, this might make it easier to introduce an abstract block
store.
The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.
For detailed information about the code coverage, see the test coverage report.
See the guideline for information on the review process.
| Type | Reviewers |
|---|---|
| ACK | danielabrozzoni, tdb3, stickies-v, brunoerg |
| Concept ACK | dergoegge |
If your review is incorrectly listed, please react with 👎 to this comment and the bot will ignore it on the next update.
Reviewers, this pull request conflicts with the following ones:
If you consider this pull request important, please also help to review the conflicting pull requests. Ideally, start with the one that should be merged first.
ACK 7aa8994c6fceae5cf8fb7e661371cdb19d2cb482
Straightforward improvement to avoid unnecessary initializations, makes sense on its own - even without potential future improvements as per PR description.
