CI: Improve documentation around replicating CI locally #31199

issue m3dwards openend this issue on October 31, 2024
  1. m3dwards commented at 8:03 pm on October 31, 2024: contributor
    I’ve received some feedback that replicating CI jobs locally isn’t straightforward. Perhaps the documentation can be improved in this area? @maflcko I understand you had some improvements in mind? Happy to also work on this.
  2. maflcko added the label Brainstorming on Nov 1, 2024
  3. maflcko added the label Docs on Nov 1, 2024
  4. maflcko added the label Build system on Nov 1, 2024
  5. maflcko added the label Tests on Nov 1, 2024
  6. maflcko commented at 7:33 am on November 1, 2024: member

    Yeah, this keeps coming up (ex: #31144 (comment)), but I don’t know how to improve the docs.

    Another related idea was to move the CC/CXX/SANITZER/… build options into a cmake preset, which could make it easier to reproduce some CI failures. Ref: https://bitcoin-irc.chaincode.com/bitcoin-core-dev/2024-09-05#1050658 and some more discussion in #30871 (comment)

  7. maflcko commented at 7:09 am on December 9, 2024: member
    In the docs, it could be clearer to explain why env may be needed: #31176 (comment)
  8. maflcko commented at 9:02 am on January 20, 2025: member
    Also, setup of qemu is missing: #31657 (comment)
  9. willcl-ark assigned hodlinator on Oct 21, 2025
  10. hodlinator commented at 2:09 pm on November 17, 2025: contributor
    PR is live: #33887
  11. maflcko commented at 2:23 pm on November 17, 2025: member

    Another related idea was to move the CC/CXX/SANITZER/… build options into a cmake preset, which could make it easier to reproduce some CI failures. Ref: https://bitcoin-irc.chaincode.com/bitcoin-core-dev/2024-09-05#1050658 and some more discussion in #30871 (comment)

    this was moved to dev-mode in #33824, so maybe this is already a step in the right direction?

  12. fanquake closed this on Nov 20, 2025

  13. fanquake reopened this on Nov 20, 2025

  14. fanquake commented at 5:23 pm on November 20, 2025: member
    @m3dwards can you advise if this can be closed after #33887. Or clarify in the description what else should be done.
  15. hebasto referenced this in commit 6cdb51c14e on Nov 20, 2025
  16. maflcko commented at 5:46 pm on November 20, 2025: member
    Yeah, I think this can be closed for now, but I’d be excited to see new issues, if there are still questions or hard CI edges. Also, happy to review more pull requests around CI docs.
  17. fanquake closed this on Nov 20, 2025


github-metadata-mirror

This is a metadata mirror of the GitHub repository bitcoin/bitcoin. This site is not affiliated with GitHub. Content is generated from a GitHub metadata backup.
generated: 2025-11-29 15:13 UTC

This site is hosted by @0xB10C
More mirrored repositories can be found on mirror.b10c.me