-testnet4
and -chain
. Instead of duplicating the full list (and having to keep it in sync), just refer to them as (test)chain selection arguments
.
-testnet4
and -chain
. Instead of duplicating the full list (and having to keep it in sync), just refer to them as (test)chain selection arguments
.
The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.
For details see: https://corecheck.dev/bitcoin/bitcoin/pulls/31264.
See the guideline for information on the review process.
Type | Reviewers |
---|---|
ACK | willcl-ark, tdb3, rkrux |
Concept ACK | edilmedeiros |
If your review is incorrectly listed, please react with 👎 to this comment and the bot will ignore it on the next update.
Concept ACK.
I understand and like the rational for not being repetitive, but don’t you think the terminology might be confusing? I could not think of any better alternatives, though.
utACK fa729ab4a276c3462e390bf2fab6cad93d3a590d
Thanks Marco, this makes sense to me.
Code Review ACK fa729ab4a276c3462e390bf2fab6cad93d3a590d
Would also support adding an example:
0- "To change the target wallet, use the -datadir, -wallet and (test)chain selection arguments.\n"
1+ "To change the target wallet, use the -datadir, -wallet and (test)chain selection arguments (e.g. -signet).\n"
0@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
1-// Copyright (c) 2016-2022 The Bitcoin Core developers
2+// Copyright (c) 2016-present The Bitcoin Core developers
-2022
in few others files as well, wonder why they -present
earlier. Good to see these getting fixed one by one.