Line 6: Before: For an immediately usable, binary version of the Bitcoin Core software, see https://bitcoincore.org/en/download/. After: For an immediately usable binary version of the Bitcoin Core software, visit Bitcoin Core Downloads. Removed the comma after "usable" for better flow, replaced "see" with "visit" for action-oriented language, and turned the URL into a clickable link. Line 16: Before: Further information about Bitcoin Core is available in the doc folder. After: For more information about Bitcoin Core, refer to the doc folder. Simplified the phrasing for better clarity and directness. Line 21: Before: Bitcoin Core is released under the terms of the MIT license. After: Bitcoin Core is released under the MIT License. Capitalized "MIT License" for correctness and consistency. These changes improve clarity, readability, and consistency in the document.
<!-- *** Please remove the following help text before submitting: *** Pull requests without a rationale and clear improvement may be closed immediately. GUI-related pull requests should be opened against https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui first. See CONTRIBUTING.md -->
<!-- Please provide clear motivation for your patch and explain how it improves Bitcoin Core user experience or Bitcoin Core developer experience significantly: * Any test improvements or new tests that improve coverage are always welcome. * All other changes should have accompanying unit tests (see `src/test/`) or functional tests (see `test/`). Contributors should note which tests cover modified code. If no tests exist for a region of modified code, new tests should accompany the change. * Bug fixes are most welcome when they come with steps to reproduce or an explanation of the potential issue as well as reasoning for the way the bug was fixed. * Features are welcome, but might be rejected due to design or scope issues. If a feature is based on a lot of dependencies, contributors should first consider building the system outside of Bitcoin Core, if possible. * Refactoring changes are only accepted if they are required for a feature or bug fix or otherwise improve developer experience significantly. For example, most "code style" refactoring changes require a thorough explanation why they are useful, what downsides they have and why they *significantly* improve developer experience or avoid serious programming bugs. Note that code style is often a subjective matter. Unless they are explicitly mentioned to be preferred in the [developer notes](/doc/developer-notes.md), stylistic code changes are usually rejected. -->
<!-- Bitcoin Core has a thorough review process and even the most trivial change needs to pass a lot of eyes and requires non-zero or even substantial time effort to review. There is a huge lack of active reviewers on the project, so patches often sit for a long time. -->
