1. 
   osrm commented at 1:38 pm on February 25, 2025: none

   Motivation

   This PR fixes a typo: “occurences” is changed to “occurrences” to improve clarity and professionalism in the codebase. There are no tests associated with this typo change, as it is purely a spelling correction. Hope this helps.

2. fix typo ecdsa_secp256k1_sha256_bitcoin_test.json

   "occurences" -> "occurrences"
   
   The word "occurences" is a typo because it is missing an "r". The correct spelling is "occurrences".

   a40b18d42c
3. 
   DrahtBot commented at 1:38 pm on February 25, 2025: contributor

   The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.

   Code Coverage & Benchmarks

   For details see: https://corecheck.dev/bitcoin/bitcoin/pulls/31949.

   Reviews

   See the guideline for information on the review process. A summary of reviews will appear here.

4. DrahtBot added the label Docs on Feb 25, 2025
5. DrahtBot added the label CI failed on Feb 25, 2025
6. 
   DrahtBot commented at 1:43 pm on February 25, 2025: contributor

   🚧 At least one of the CI tasks failed. Debug: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/runs/37785040184

   Try to run the tests locally, according to the documentation. However, a CI failure may still happen due to a number of reasons, for example:

   • Possibly due to a silent merge conflict (the changes in this pull request being incompatible with the current code in the target branch). If so, make sure to rebase on the latest commit of the target branch.

   • A sanitizer issue, which can only be found by compiling with the sanitizer and running the affected test.

   • An intermittent issue.

   Leave a comment here, if you need help tracking down a confusing failure.

7. 
   maflcko commented at 1:44 pm on February 25, 2025: member

   Closing per CI failure. You’ll have to submit upstream
8. maflcko closed this on Feb 25, 2025

   ---

Contributors
osrm DrahtBot maflcko

Labels
Docs CI failed