[29.x] qt: 29.1 translations update #32352

1. 
   hebasto commented at 2:21 pm on April 25, 2025: member

   This PR fetches the recent translation updates from Transifex.

   Closes #32295.

   Notes for reviewers:

   1. “fr_CM” and “fr_LU” have been dropped as part of phasing out of territory-specific translations.

   2. The translations for the following languages, which appear to be the result of a mistake or an act of vandalism, have been discarded (also see #32004):

      • Czech (cs)
      • Danish (da)
      • Dutch (nl)
      • Vietnamese (vi)

   3. Update for Silesian (szl) has been discarded as malicious.

2. hebasto added this to the milestone 29.1 on Apr 25, 2025
3. 
   DrahtBot commented at 2:22 pm on April 25, 2025: contributor

   The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.

   Code Coverage & Benchmarks

   For details see: https://corecheck.dev/bitcoin/bitcoin/pulls/32352.

   Reviews

   See the guideline for information on the review process. A summary of reviews will appear here.

4. DrahtBot added the label Backport on Apr 25, 2025
5. 
   hebasto commented at 2:26 pm on April 25, 2025: member

   Closes #32295.

   However, the Polish (pl) translation still have a couple of issues:

   1. String 160: Mismatch between ‘S&how’ and ‘%Wyświetl’

   2. String 452: Mismatch between ‘Transaction broadcast successfully! Transaction ID: %1’ and ’transakcja’

6. 
   hebasto commented at 2:53 pm on April 25, 2025: member

   Closes #32295.

   However, the Polish (pl) translation still have a couple of issues:

   1. String 160: Mismatch between 'S&how' and '%Wyświetl'
   
   2. String 452: Mismatch between 'Transaction broadcast successfully! Transaction ID: %1' and 'transakcja'
   

   Friendly ping @jesterhodl :)

7. 
   jesterhodl commented at 2:57 pm on April 25, 2025: none

   Transaction broadcast successfully

   Both fixed in Transifex.

8. hebasto force-pushed on Apr 25, 2025
9. 
   hebasto commented at 3:19 pm on April 25, 2025: member

   Transaction broadcast successfully

   Both fixed in Transifex.

   Thanks! Updated and undrafted.

10. hebasto marked this as ready for review on Apr 25, 2025
11. 
    jesterhodl commented at 5:19 pm on April 25, 2025: none

    So I rerun the script and found some more issues and updated Transifex. v29 is not translated 100% yet from what I see, but at least the worst offenders: spam, typos, gross errors should be fixed now.
12. qt: 29.1 translations update eb78022e4c
13. hebasto force-pushed on Apr 25, 2025
14. 
    hebasto commented at 5:57 pm on April 25, 2025: member

    So I rerun the script and found some more issues and updated Transifex. v29 is not translated 100% yet from what I see, but at least the worst offenders: spam, typos, gross errors should be fixed now.

    Thank you! Updated.

15. 
    maflcko commented at 8:08 am on April 27, 2025: member

    The erroneous format specs still remain: #32295 (comment)
16. 
    jesterhodl commented at 12:44 pm on April 27, 2025: none

    The erroneous format specs still remain: #32295 (comment)

    Ok, for Polish there was one. I just corrected it. I’m happy to correct other languages for this sort of issue, but I’m only granted access to Polish team in Transifex. If someone grants me temporary access I can fix others and go back to being just Polish Team.

17. 
    jesterhodl commented at 3:44 pm on April 27, 2025: none

    check_translations shouldn’t complain for any polish labels as of now. I ran it. Transifex is updated.
18. 
    maflcko commented at 4:00 pm on April 27, 2025: member

    check_translations shouldn’t complain for any polish labels as of now. I ran it.

    Thanks. Just for reference, the script doesn’t need to report no complaints. Sometimes it complains about perfectly fine translations. Also, it may not even be deterministic if called several times with a cleared cache.

19. 
    jesterhodl commented at 4:03 pm on April 27, 2025: none

    check_translations shouldn’t complain for any polish labels as of now. I ran it.

    Thanks. Just for reference, the script doesn’t need to report no complaints. Sometimes it complains about perfectly fine translations. Also, it may not even be deterministic if called several times with a cleared cache.

    OK. By the way I noticed it. It complained A should be B, and then B should be A. Neither form would make it happy. I opted for something else.

Contributors
hebasto DrahtBot jesterhodl maflcko

Labels
Backport

Milestone
29.1