test: Add functional tests for blockreconstructionextratxn #33016

pull bigshiny90 wants to merge 1 commits into bitcoin:29.x from bigshiny90:compactblocks-extratxn-tests-for-29x changing 2 files +380 −0
  1. bigshiny90 commented at 4:32 pm on July 19, 2025: none

    This adds tests for the -blockreconstructionextratxn parameter which controls the extra transaction pool used for compact block reconstruction.

    Uses RBF transaction pairs to populate the pool since that’s a straightforward way to get transactions into the extra pool - send an original, then replace it with higher fee, and the original ends up in the extra pool.

    Note: Targeting 29.x because the extra transaction pool eviction behavior tested here doesn’t currently work on master.

  2. test: Add functional tests for blockreconstructionextratxn
    Add comprehensive tests for the extra transaction pool used in compact
    block reconstruction.
    9e60f00329
  3. DrahtBot added the label Backport on Jul 19, 2025
  4. DrahtBot commented at 4:32 pm on July 19, 2025: contributor

    The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.

    Code Coverage & Benchmarks

    For details see: https://corecheck.dev/bitcoin/bitcoin/pulls/33016.

    Reviews

    See the guideline for information on the review process. A summary of reviews will appear here.

  5. Marodero56 commented at 5:15 pm on July 19, 2025: none
    Hello
  6. Marodero56 commented at 5:16 pm on July 19, 2025: none
    Hello 👋
  7. DrahtBot added the label CI failed on Jul 19, 2025
  8. DrahtBot commented at 6:28 pm on July 19, 2025: contributor

    🚧 At least one of the CI tasks failed. Task lint: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/runs/46316118729 LLM reason (✨ experimental): The CI failure is caused by lint errors, specifically trailing whitespace issues and code style problems detected by ruff.

    Try to run the tests locally, according to the documentation. However, a CI failure may still happen due to a number of reasons, for example:

    • Possibly due to a silent merge conflict (the changes in this pull request being incompatible with the current code in the target branch). If so, make sure to rebase on the latest commit of the target branch.

    • A sanitizer issue, which can only be found by compiling with the sanitizer and running the affected test.

    • An intermittent issue.

    Leave a comment here, if you need help tracking down a confusing failure.

  9. bigshiny90 closed this on Jul 19, 2025

  10. bigshiny90 deleted the branch on Jul 19, 2025

github-metadata-mirror

This is a metadata mirror of the GitHub repository bitcoin/bitcoin. This site is not affiliated with GitHub. Content is generated from a GitHub metadata backup.
generated: 2025-07-23 12:12 UTC

This site is hosted by @0xB10C
More mirrored repositories can be found on mirror.b10c.me