Introduce basic modularization #5752

1. 
   jonasschnelli commented at 1:08 pm on February 4, 2015: contributor

   According to #3440 it would make sense to decouple the wallet and the miner (and maybe other things) from the init-/shutdown-process, etc.

   This is related to #5686, #5744, #5745

   If this gets merged, my plans are to first transform the miner into a module, then the wallet. The goal should be to remove the ENABLE_WALLET ifdefs and make use of the modular concept.

   If this looks to useless, i can transform the internal miner into a module within this PR (but it will be a harder review).

2. Introduce basic modularization

   According to #3440 it would make sense to decouple the wallet and the miner (and maybe other things) from the init-/shutdown-process, etc.
   
   This is related to #5686, #5744, #5745

   7bd633c39a
3. jonasschnelli force-pushed on Feb 4, 2015
4. 
   maraoz commented at 3:52 pm on February 5, 2015: contributor

   Concept ACK
5. laanwj added the label Improvement on Feb 19, 2015
6. 
   jgarzik commented at 6:01 pm on September 15, 2015: contributor

   Seems reasonable but we shouldn’t let this languish - concept ACK - but we should probably close if it won’t get merged anytime soon.
7. 
   jonasschnelli commented at 6:08 pm on September 15, 2015: contributor

   Agreed. The modularization in general first requires a clean masterplan. At the moment its unclear what use cases bitcoin-core should solve in a post modularized world.

   I think we all agree that bitcoin-core requires modularization to allow safer code changes, detaching of the UI and Wallet, etc.

   Closing, and signaling willingness to work on this after we have a more clean plan what we do want to achieve in terms of modularization.

8. jonasschnelli closed this on Sep 15, 2015

   ---

9. DrahtBot locked this on Sep 8, 2021

Contributors
jonasschnelli maraoz jgarzik

Labels
Refactoring