This looks after a heavy changeset, but it's not. This will only move wallet related files to /src/wallet/.
The PR includes no code changes.
Could once be renamed from /src/wallet to /src/legacywallet.
This looks after a heavy changeset, but it's not. This will only move wallet related files to /src/wallet/.
The PR includes no code changes.
Could once be renamed from /src/wallet to /src/legacywallet.
You forgot to git add the new directory, it looks like.
@TheBlueMatt Bah. Now added. Thanks.
ACK (but needs rebase)
Rebased.
Since there's a reasonably clean separation of the wallet files, I'd prefer to build the objects in the subdir, same as qt and tests:
diff --git a/src/Makefile.am b/src/Makefile.am
index 88e7af2..1ff3180 100644
--- a/src/Makefile.am
+++ b/src/Makefile.am
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ BITCOIN_INCLUDES=-I$(builddir) -I$(builddir)/obj $(BOOST_CPPFLAGS) $(LEVELDB_CPP
BITCOIN_INCLUDES += -I$(srcdir)/secp256k1/include
LIBBITCOIN_SERVER=libbitcoin_server.a
-LIBBITCOIN_WALLET=libbitcoin_wallet.a
+LIBBITCOIN_WALLET=wallet/libbitcoin_wallet.a
LIBBITCOIN_COMMON=libbitcoin_common.a
LIBBITCOIN_CLI=libbitcoin_cli.a
LIBBITCOIN_UTIL=libbitcoin_util.a
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ EXTRA_LIBRARIES = \
libbitcoin_cli.a
if ENABLE_WALLET
BITCOIN_INCLUDES += $(BDB_CPPFLAGS)
-EXTRA_LIBRARIES += libbitcoin_wallet.a
+EXTRA_LIBRARIES += $(LIBBITCOIN_WALLET)
endif
if BUILD_BITCOIN_LIBS
@@ -191,8 +191,8 @@ libbitcoin_server_a_SOURCES = \
# wallet: shared between bitcoind and bitcoin-qt, but only linked
# when wallet enabled
-libbitcoin_wallet_a_CPPFLAGS = $(BITCOIN_INCLUDES)
-libbitcoin_wallet_a_SOURCES = \
+wallet_libbitcoin_wallet_a_CPPFLAGS = $(BITCOIN_INCLUDES)
+wallet_libbitcoin_wallet_a_SOURCES = \
wallet/db.cpp \
crypter.cpp \
wallet/rpcdump.cpp \
@@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ bitcoind_LDADD = \
$(LIBSECP256K1)
if ENABLE_WALLET
-bitcoind_LDADD += libbitcoin_wallet.a
+bitcoind_LDADD += $(LIBBITCOIN_WALLET)
endif
bitcoind_LDADD += $(BOOST_LIBS) $(BDB_LIBS) $(SSL_LIBS) $(CRYPTO_LIBS) $(MINIUPNPC_LIBS)
diff --git a/src/Makefile.qt.include b/src/Makefile.qt.include
index 31fe3a9..7b48b41 100644
--- a/src/Makefile.qt.include
+++ b/src/Makefile.qt.include
@@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ QT_QM=$(QT_TS:.ts=.qm)
SECONDARY: $(QT_QM)
-qt/bitcoinstrings.cpp: $(libbitcoin_server_a_SOURCES) $(libbitcoin_wallet_a_SOURCES)
+qt/bitcoinstrings.cpp: $(libbitcoin_server_a_SOURCES) $(wallet_libbitcoin_wallet_a_SOURCES) [@test](/bitcoin-bitcoin/contributor/test/) -n $(XGETTEXT) || echo "xgettext is required for updating translations"
$(AM_V_GEN) cd $(srcdir); XGETTEXT=$(XGETTEXT) ../share/qt/extract_strings_qt.py $^
That'd be my preference since imo it's cleaner, but I'm not strongly opposed to leaving it as-is.
ACK either way.
@theuni Yes. I think this should be the long term goal. Let me play with it.
What about the wallet tests under src/wallet/test? I assume we keep these in the src/Makefile.test.include for now?
The problem is, that currently other tests relay on a wallet. I try to slowly also decouple things there.
@jonasschnelli sure, no problem if things slowly move that way, no need to try to do it all at once. Yes, tests are fine as you handled them imo. Eventually we can create a Makefile.wallet.include once it's more decoupled.
ut ACK
Rebased.
What if we merge this (has ACK from @theuni and @laanwj)? This requires rebase often when getting out of date. The makefile changes (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/5745#issuecomment-72989968) could be done in a upcoming PR.
utACK
utACK
could once be renamed from /src/wallet to /src/legacywallet.
Rebased and ready for merge. :)