This hopefully won't make sense for 0.12, but do we want it for 0.11?
configure: Detect (and reject) LibreSSL #6244
pull luke-jr wants to merge 1 commits into bitcoin:master from luke-jr:conf_detect_libressl changing 1 files +8 −0-
luke-jr commented at 2:24 PM on June 6, 2015: member
-
configure: Detect (and reject) LibreSSL a5a81f7354
-
petertodd commented at 3:53 PM on June 8, 2015: contributor
utACK
-
theuni commented at 6:07 PM on June 8, 2015: member
I know @gmaxwell puts a good amount of time into auditing new OpenSSL releases, so I think it's worth getting his opinion here. I suspect that at this point he and @sipa may be more comfortable relying on libsecp256k1 for consensus-critical functionality than forks of OpenSSL. I certainly may be wrong in that assumption, though.
-
laanwj commented at 12:35 PM on June 9, 2015: member
ACK. I think we should get this in until OpenSSL ceases to be used for the consensus.
- laanwj added the label Build system on Jun 9, 2015
- laanwj added the label Consensus on Jun 9, 2015
-
gmaxwell commented at 1:27 PM on June 9, 2015: contributor
utACK.
-
theuni commented at 7:18 PM on June 9, 2015: member
ok, ut ACK then.
- laanwj merged this on Jun 10, 2015
- laanwj closed this on Jun 10, 2015
- laanwj referenced this in commit d9a94b7009 on Jun 10, 2015
- laanwj referenced this in commit 0401aa2e8f on Jun 10, 2015
- laanwj referenced this in commit 09334e04a9 on Jun 10, 2015
-
laanwj commented at 6:19 AM on June 10, 2015: member
Cherry-picked to 0.10 as 09334e04a90fa49b68f9d3b3e3c4d739de144876, 0.11 as 0401aa2e8f6149109c05fc525116cf042bfb713c
- reddink referenced this in commit 1d4dd16ec5 on May 27, 2020
- MarcoFalke locked this on Sep 8, 2021
