[0.13] backport: Treat high-sigop transactions as larger rather than rejecting them #8438

1. 
   dexX7 commented at 7:50 pm on July 31, 2016: contributor

   This submission includes the patch from #8365 to treat high-sigop transactions as larger instead of rejecting them, for 0.13.
2. Treat high-sigop transactions as larger rather than rejecting them 3f65ba2b3b
3. laanwj added the label Backport on Aug 1, 2016
4. 
   sipa commented at 10:31 pm on August 2, 2016: member

   utACK 3f65ba2b3bd6c4e269f8f89b16d386b443431693 This should have been backported already.
5. 
   MarcoFalke commented at 7:16 am on August 3, 2016: member

   Nit: Can you format the cherry pick like the other backports? I.e. include where it came from?
6. dexX7 renamed this:
   [0.13] Treat high-sigop transactions as larger rather than rejecting them
   [0.13] backport: Treat high-sigop transactions as larger rather than rejecting them
   on Aug 3, 2016
7. 
   sdaftuar commented at 4:44 pm on August 4, 2016: member

   utACK 3f65ba2b3bd6c4e269f8f89b16d386b443431693
8. 
   btcdrak commented at 7:10 pm on August 4, 2016: contributor

   utACK 3f65ba2
9. laanwj added this to the milestone 0.13.0 on Aug 4, 2016
10. 
    gmaxwell commented at 7:46 pm on August 4, 2016: contributor

    utACK
11. 
    dexX7 commented at 6:43 pm on August 8, 2016: contributor

    This should have been backported already.

    May I ask why it wasn’t integrated in the meantime?

12. laanwj merged this on Aug 10, 2016
13. laanwj closed this on Aug 10, 2016

    ---

14. laanwj referenced this in commit edc2c700a7 on Aug 10, 2016
15. 
    MarcoFalke commented at 8:52 am on October 3, 2016: member

    Please link to the original pull in the commit body
16. 
    dexX7 commented at 8:54 am on October 3, 2016: contributor

    Sorry @MarcoFalke, will do so next time!
17. DrahtBot locked this on Sep 8, 2021

Contributors
dexX7 sipa MarcoFalke sdaftuar btcdrak gmaxwell

Labels
Backport

Milestone
0.13.0