This submission includes the patch from #8365 to treat high-sigop transactions as larger instead of rejecting them, for 0.13.
[0.13] backport: Treat high-sigop transactions as larger rather than rejecting them #8438
pull dexX7 wants to merge 1 commits into bitcoin:0.13 from dexX7:btc-13-sigops changing 6 files +15 −12-
dexX7 commented at 7:50 PM on July 31, 2016: contributor
-
Treat high-sigop transactions as larger rather than rejecting them 3f65ba2b3b
- laanwj added the label Backport on Aug 1, 2016
-
sipa commented at 10:31 PM on August 2, 2016: member
utACK 3f65ba2b3bd6c4e269f8f89b16d386b443431693 This should have been backported already.
-
MarcoFalke commented at 7:16 AM on August 3, 2016: member
Nit: Can you format the cherry pick like the other backports? I.e. include where it came from?
- dexX7 renamed this:
[0.13] Treat high-sigop transactions as larger rather than rejecting them
[0.13] backport: Treat high-sigop transactions as larger rather than rejecting them
on Aug 3, 2016 -
sdaftuar commented at 4:44 PM on August 4, 2016: member
utACK 3f65ba2b3bd6c4e269f8f89b16d386b443431693
-
btcdrak commented at 7:10 PM on August 4, 2016: contributor
utACK 3f65ba2
- laanwj added this to the milestone 0.13.0 on Aug 4, 2016
-
gmaxwell commented at 7:46 PM on August 4, 2016: contributor
utACK
-
dexX7 commented at 6:43 PM on August 8, 2016: contributor
This should have been backported already.
May I ask why it wasn't integrated in the meantime?
- laanwj merged this on Aug 10, 2016
- laanwj closed this on Aug 10, 2016
- laanwj referenced this in commit edc2c700a7 on Aug 10, 2016
-
MarcoFalke commented at 8:52 AM on October 3, 2016: member
Please link to the original pull in the commit body
-
dexX7 commented at 8:54 AM on October 3, 2016: contributor
Sorry @MarcoFalke, will do so next time!
- DrahtBot locked this on Sep 8, 2021
Labels
Milestone
0.13.0