better protection needed against compromised authors #9781

issue rebroad opened this issue on February 17, 2017

rebroad commented at 3:49 AM on February 17, 2017: contributor

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/04/warrant-canary-faq

I am not aware if any canaries have yet been used by any authors on this project, but given the risk of the project being compromised by backdoors enforced by gag orders, i would suggest that canaries be deployed by all authors working on the project at their earliest convenience.

I can confirm that as of today I have not received any gag orders or similar. <-- simple example
dcousens commented at 5:09 AM on February 17, 2017: contributor

Canaries are not legal in every country.
fanquake commented at 2:34 AM on February 19, 2017: member

I don't this this is the right place to discuss this. Maybe the stackexchange would be better? https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/
fanquake closed this on Feb 19, 2017
DrahtBot locked this on Sep 8, 2021

Contributors