Add Murch’s inputs February 2025 merged without sanitizers #218

Repeat of #217, but merged without using sanitizers.

coverage previous pull:https://drahtbot.space/host_reports/DrahtBot/reports/coverage_fuzz/monotree/1172bc4157eefe80/7ca0eff221557a8b/fuzz.coverage/index.html coverage this pull: https://drahtbot.space/host_reports/DrahtBot/reports/coverage_fuzz/monotree/1172bc4157eefe80/107f00230b03630a/fuzz.coverage/index.html

Size previous pull: 6.0GB https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6267654383599616?logs=fuzz_inputs_total_size#L1 Size this pull: 5.1GB https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6300484341858304?logs=fuzz_inputs_total_size#L1

So it looks like this is overall better, because:

• The coverage is the same (or slightly higher)
• The size is smaller

Obviously, there could be a risk that is hard to measure that some sanitizer-triggering inputs are "missed", but this risk should be minimal and acceptable, because:

• Fuzzing still happens with sanitizers, so any issues will still be found during normal fuzzing (normally even before this pull to qa-assets is created?)
• Limiting qa-assets bloat is acceptable and in line with use_value_profile, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/d6c229d8bd4a6203a7255c140aa35c59fb20378b/test/fuzz/test_runner.py#L309

So, lgtm. I'll merge on Friday.

Okay sounds good